1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mr Goodwill [35]
2 years ago
8

What did Harding mean when he said the United States needs “normalcy”

History
1 answer:
Zepler [3.9K]2 years ago
4 0
He meant the USA needed stuff to be normal
You might be interested in
The Articles of Confederation were<br>m​
lana [24]

Answer:

The Articles of Confederation (1781) was the original Constitution before being replaced in 1789. The Articles of Confederation favored power to the states. The Articles of Confederation was all created by the 13 States soon after the American Revolution. Obviously, the Articles did not turn out successful. For example, it did not have any sort of national court or executive branch. Each state had there own form of currency. If a amendment wanted to be passed, ALL 13 colonies had to agree

4 0
3 years ago
What led jane addams to open the hull house
Margaret [11]
She wanted to lead reform so the Hull house was made so that education and social services could be provided to the working class immigrants and laborers.
8 0
3 years ago
Which is false statement about the united states in the years after world war I
andrezito [222]
This would be an answer
But I don't know exactly what your answer choices are.
6 0
3 years ago
Compare and contrast the changes in the government, economy, and society from the Romanov era under the tsar to the rule by the
Tresset [83]

The rulers of the Soviet Union viewed empire and imperialism in ideological terms as ‘the highest and final stage of capitalism’.1 By this Leninist definition, the Soviet Union did not identify itself as an empire, and instead, its leaders vehemently denounced imperialism that was carried out by its enemies and competitors: the capitalist states. Despite its own anguish over being identified as an empire, the Soviet Union indeed was one. While the meaning of ‘empire’ has shifted over time, for the purposes of this paper the definition of empire is in the sense of a great power, a polity, ruling over vast territories and people, leaving a significant impact on the history of world civilizations.2 As the characteristics of the Soviet Union are examined, support for viewing the USSR as an empire grows.

The Soviet Union emerged after the Russian Revolution of 1917. The Tsarist Russian Empire’s government was overthrown by the local soviets, led by the Bolsheviks. The Bolsheviks attempted to replace the Russian empire with a communist one, in which socialism would make nationalismobsolete and in place there would be a supra-national imperial ideology.3 Still, coming back to the issue of ‘empire’, the Soviet Union clearly maintained a commanding control over multi-ethnic and multi-linguistic societies that surpassed the extent of the preceding Imperial Russia Empire. A question thus arises: was the USSR a Russian empire? The first aspect to consider is if the USSR was a continuation of Russian imperialist power or if an intrinsic distinction can be made between the two. What is notable to address is what is meant by ‘Russian’ identity and nationality, its formation, and reshaping through time. Once this will be accounted for, this paper will move on with an answer to the question: the USSR was indeed an essentially different empire from the one preceding it, and thus, the USSR was not a Russian empire.


8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the War Powers Resolution of 1973 affect the power of the US president?
forsale [732]

Answer: C. It required the president to inform Congress within 48 hours of the details of any troop commitment.

Context/detail:

Passed in 1973 over the veto of President Richard Nixon, the War Powers Resolution (its official name) blocks presidents from continuing the pursuance of a war without Congress's approval.  In practice, however, the War Powers Act has often been sidestepped by presidents.  The US Constitution leaves some tension in place between the legislative and executive branch when it comes to the country's involvement in war.  Article I of the Constitution gives Congress the power to declare war.  But Article II names the President the Commander-in-Chief, and presidents frequently have understood that role as containing the authority to deploy US forces without first getting congressional approval.  The War Powers Act has been an ongoing point of controversy as US forces have been sent into all sorts of conflict zones in the 21st century without formal declarations of war.

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP!!!!!!! PLEASE!!! How did the greater participation of women in the workforce change their role in American society?
    15·1 answer
  • Which best describes why China introduced the one-child policy?
    15·2 answers
  • the group who was hurt by the introduction of the cotton gin A.ministers B.plantation owners C.slaves D.overseers
    10·1 answer
  • True or false: mao zedong successfully created a socialist society in china that was completely egalitarian
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following airlines did not merge to save on costs through efficiency? Continental Airlines merging with United Airl
    6·1 answer
  • The Second Continental Congress:
    13·1 answer
  • During the Cold War, what was the stated main objective of the United States in engaging in proxy wars against the Soviet Union?
    13·2 answers
  • PLSS HELP ASAP!!
    5·1 answer
  • Pls help
    14·1 answer
  • Can you help me write an essay?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!