The Answer is -3/2
Below is how I got that answer
(-12) / 6+2
-12/ 8 (Simplify the problem by adding 6 and 2, remove the parenthesis).
-3/2 (Simplify -12/8 by dividing it by 4)
Answer: 14.4units
See attached for more information about the question.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given;
LM = 24
KN = 10
NM = 15
KM = 10+15 = 25
Using the Triangle proportionality theorem.
Since LK || PN (LK is parallel to PN)
KN/NM = LP/PM .....1
and
NM/KM = PM/LM ......2
Substituting the values into 2, we have
15/25 = PM/24
PM = 15 × 24/25
PM = 14.4 units
Answer:
Given the size of rectangular plate in advertisement = 5 cm by 3cm.
Given the condition for length should be = 0.25 of 5 cm
Step-by-step explanation:
Now, have to write the inequality from the given data.
Therefore, 5- 0.25 ≤ L ≤ 5+.25
4.75 ≤ L ≤ 5.25
We know that the area of a rectangle = Length × Width.
Width = 3
Thus, the area is 3 × L
3× (4.75) ≤ 3×L ≤3× (5.25)
14.25 ≤ 3×L ≤ 15.75
So the minimum area is 14.25 cm^2
The maximum area is 15.75 cm^2
Answer:
b = 55°
c = 35°
Step-by-step explanation:
b° = 180° - (85°+40°) = 180° - 125° = 55°
c° = 180° - (b°+90°) = 180° - (55°+90°) = 180° - 145° = 35°
Answer:No. A strong correlation does not imply causation.
Step-by-step explanation:
Cause and effect relationship is not explained by correlations. A cause and effect relationship can only be established by carrying out carefully controlled experiments.
Hence, a strong correlation between the the intake of soda and accidents does not necessarily imply that soda intake causes accident.
A lurking variable in this study may be the speed of the drivers. A lurking variable is not controlled but significantly impacts results obtained from the study.
Since the speed of the drivers is not strictly controlled, it may just be a lurking variable.