Answer:
Yes there is sufficient evidence to reject the company's evidence
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The sample size is n = 25
The mean is 
The standard deviation is 
The z-score is z = -1.94
The null hypothesis is 
The alternative hypothesis is 
Generally the p-value is mathematically evaluated as
From the z table the area under the normal curve to the left corresponding to -1.94 is
=> 
=> 
Let assume the level of significance is 
Hence the 
this mean that
The decision rule is
Fail to reject the null hypothesis
The conclusion is
There is sufficient evidence to reject the company's evidence
Answer:
The yellow polygon is the scaled version of the red one (scaled by 3×), so the variable w = 9
Answer: 2√2 - 3Explanation:The expession written properly is:
To rationalize that kind of expressions, this is to eliminate the radicals on the denominator you use conjugate rationalization.
That is, you have to multiply both numerator and denominator times the conjugate of the denominator.
The conjugate of √3+√6 is √3 - √6, so let's do it:
To help you with the solution of that expression, I will show each part.
1) Numerator: (√3 - √6) . (√3 - √6) = (√3 - √6)^2 = (√3)^2 - 2√3√6 + (√6)^2 =
= 3 - 2√18 + 6 = 9 - 6√2.
2) Denominator: (√3 + √6).(√3 - √6) = (√3)^2 - (√6)^2 = 3 - 6 = - 3
3) Then the resulting expression is:
9 - 6√2
-----------
-3
Which can be further simplified, dividing by - 3
-3 + 2√2
Answer: 2√2 - 3
Answer:
uit is the mixed number of decimal point
Answer:
a = -8
Step-by-step explanation:
-48 = 6(a)
divide both sides by 6
-8 = a
