Answer:
Supplier dependence
Explanation:
When an entity finds itself in a situation where it has to rely on a particular supplier or provider of service for its business operations, either as a result of not being able to get an alternative supplier or the importance of the suppliers product to the entity, such is called supplier dependence.
It is very risky for an entity to depend on a particular source for input. This reverse order of an entity depending on the supplier for business strategy instead of the supplier depending on the entity is not a good business practice.
It’s easy for our own strategy to be determined by what our suppliers are doing. If we become too dependent, we risk having our strategy set by our suppliers rather than having them support our strategy. I’ve been thinking a lot here recently about how much suppliers can direct you
Answer:
C) It would allow them to look at the furniture products that the company offers.
Explanation:
Setting up a website would be beneficial to the company, which will have its products on display, and may even make online sales, but especially to consumers, who can observe the types of wood products that this company produces. This can make consumers analyze products without having to go to the store, which makes buying something more comfortable.
Answer:
B $12,300
Explanation:
Note that the movements in the prepaid insurance account balance is as a result of payments and amortization of these expenses as they fall due. While additional payments increases the prepaid insurance balance, amortization reduces it.
Given that the ending balance in the Prepaid insurance account for 2018 is $1,400. This is the opening balance for prepaid insurance in 2019. Given that the insurance expense for 2019 is $12,800 and the ending balance in the Prepaid insurance account for 2019 is $900
Let the amount paid in 2019 be r
Then
$1,400 + r - $12,800 = $900
r = $900 + $12,800 - $1,400
r = $12,300
The right answer is B $12,300
Answer:
Your correct answer ia A. debit to purchases
Explanation:
PLEASE MARK BRAINLIEST!!!
The cengage learning for the mitigation is the difference between the agreed upon $72000 less what was earned from the $25000 position that barton managed to obtain
<u>Explanation</u>:
Mitigation of damages:
In the case of barton v. vanhorn a court would consider barton's attempts at findings similar employment a reasonable step in mitigating her damages.
Under the doctrine of damage mitigation, a wrongfully terminated employee must look for other compartable employment, and subtract whatever you make from that job from what you request in damages.
Damages in the case would be the difference between the agreed upon $72000 less what was earned from the $25000 position that barton managed to obtain.
