Answer&Explanation:
I would have to rely on minority influence and informational conformity. In order to accomplish this I need to provide concrete information and examples to this other five members of the groups, examples that will appeal to their emotions such that they will realise the effect of a low tuition fee. I would also try to relate these examples to show them how this affect them personally , people are easily convinced if they see that something affect them personally. Once they have been convinced and persuaded by logical reasons and examples that relate to them personally then I would have been able to establish an ally
OMMMMMMGGGG I LOVE 13 REASONS WHY I THINK TYLER KILLED ALEX BECAUSE HE HAD A SUITCASE FULL OF GUNS AND TOOK DOWN TYLER PICTURE NOW TYLER WANT TO KILL EVERYONE AT SCHOOL BECAUSE HE WAS BULLIED, THAT WHAT I THINK
Answer:
Andrew Lloyd Webber
Explanation:
Musicals (including Hair, Fiddler on the Roof, and West Side Story) have generally been reflective of their time.
Recently, the musicals of Andrew Lloyd Webber have brought a new arena for spectacular and strange unbelievable parts.
Answer: it’s called Liberal feminism.
Explanation:
Liberal feminism, sometimes known as mainstream feminism, is a subset of feminism that focuses on achieving gender equality through political and legal reform within a liberal democratic framework.
Answer:
A. It offers one shortcut to use in deciding how to behave when we don't have the time to examine all the evidence.
Explanation:
Automatic - unthinking consistency occurs when we made a conclusion based on our pre-conceived bias rather than based on objective observation.
For example . Let's say that a person make this conclusion:
- He failed to get the jobs because God does not wants him to.
In the example above, we can clearly tell that such conclusion ignore a lot of complicated observations. It is a type of conclusion that many people made automatically because they choose to a comfortable way of thinking rather than a correct way of thinking.
That person does not consider whether other people made more effort to obtain the jobs, how well he performed in the interview, the type of position he aimed for, etc. He just resorted to deity rather than examining all important evidences that can contribute to the situation.
