Answer:
One of the roles of Federal courts is to review cases that have been appealed in the state courts, Option A.
Explanation:
Federal courts hear many cases like the cases which involve constitutionality of a law. There may be cases which involves treaties of public ministers or Ambassadors, disputes between two or more states can also be resolved by federal courts.
In 1950s, though the Constitution had stated that everyone is equal but still African Americans were not always treated equally. Federal courts could take cases that have been appealed in state courts, in case the concerned person is not happy with the result.
A theory of personality that emphasizes unconscious motives and conflicts.
Answer:
0.0197 m
Explanation:
Given that,
Last week, a coral reef grew 19.7 mm taller.
We need to find how much it grow in meters.
We know that,
1 mm = 0.001 m
It means,
19.7 mm = (19.7 × 0.001) m
= 0.0197 m
So, it grows 0.0197 m.
Answer:
This is an example of marginal analysis, as the decisions made by Raphael are on margin.
Explanation:
The decision of Raphael about pool versus bike time is totally a "how-much decision". It is clear that pool time and bike time can both reduce the time for race. However, the efficiency of pool time is high currently, and hence there is much sense in trying to spend more time in the pool and less on bike. This however makes no sense that all the time is spent in the pool and no time biking. Raphael only intends to alter the number of hours spend on each activity at the margin.
