When a court decision is final it gives an example to follow for future cases that are similar in nature, what is this called?
Stare decisis ( a doctrine that every court must follow)
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Do we have to write the reason type in yes in the comments then I will write down the reason or no then I will not type the reason
Hope this hellped
Answer: I think that the rule is very wrong and it is very foolish.
I think that if someone is breaking the law, we should be able to provide all the evidence we need to put this thief behind bars.
If nobody recorded, how else would the evidence get to the police?
If nobody recorded, the thief can say that he did not steal anything.
The Police and the Supreme Court need to have evidence that way there is no confusion and that way there is not anymore trouble.
Explanation:
The Supreme Court original jurisdiction applies to cases involving disputes between states, action involving various public officials, disputes between the United States and a state.
Hope this helps :)
Answer:
Both were shocking murders sensationalized by the media, ensuring the cases would be well known outside of Fall River and Boulder, and over time. Both remain unsolved, with theories involving different perpetrators. Andrew and Abby were murdered in their home with two other members of the house known to be present, Lizzie and the maid, Bridget Sullivan. Like the Ramseys, Lizzie has been thought to be guilty by a majority of people. And like the Ramseys, an unknown intruder has been offered as a defense.
Explanation:
