Answer:you have to make the inequality first
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
x + y = ±15
Step-by-step explanation:
Step 1: Write out systems of equations
x - y = 1
xy = 56
Step 2: Rearrange 1st equation
x = y + 1
Step 3: Substitution
(y + 1)y = 56
Step 4: Distribute
y² + y = 56
Step 5: Solve for <em>y</em>
y² + y - 56 = 0
(y - 7)(y + 8) = 0
y = -8, 7
Step 6: Plug in <em>y </em>to find <em>x</em>
x - 7 = 1
x = 8
x - (-8) = 1
x + 8 = 1
x = -7
Step 7: Find answer
x + y = ?
8 + 7 = 15
-7 + -8 = -15
So both 15 and -15 could be the answer.
Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
Time taken by Jami to mow 1/6 acres is 8 minutes=8/60=2/15 hours.
Rate at which Jami is mowing will be:
rate=(number of acres)/(time)=(1/6)/(2/15)
=1/6÷2/15
=1/6×15/2
=5/4 acres/hour
=1.25 acres/hour
From above calculations we conclude that Jami cannot mow 1.5 acres in 1 hour
Answer:
10201
Step-by-step explanation:
=(101)²
=(100+1)²
={100²+2(100)(1)+1²} [(a+b)²=a²+2ab+b²]
=10000+200+1
=10201
