1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sever21 [200]
3 years ago
10

Consider a simple example economy where there are two goods, coconuts and restaurant meals (coconut-based). There are two firms.

A coconut producer collects and sells 10 million coconuts at $2.00 each. The firm pays $5 million in wages, $0.5 million in interest on an old loan, and $1.5 million in taxes to the government. We also know that 4 million coconuts are sold to the public for consumption, and 6 million coconuts are sold to the restaurant firm, which uses them to prepare meals. The restaurant sells $30 million in meals. The restaurant pays $4 million in wages and the government $3 million in taxes. The government supplies security and accounting services and employs only labor, and government workers are paid $5.5 million, collected in taxed by the government. Finally, consumers pay $1 million in taxes to the government in addition to the taxes paid by the two firms.
Required:
a. Compute GDP for this simple economy using the product approach.
b. Compute GDP for this simple economy using the expenditure approach.
c. Compute GDP for this simple economy using the income approach.
d. Now, suppose that the coconut producer cannot sell 1 million coconuts during the course of the year. These are collected coconuts that are not sold to the public (assume that sales to the other firm, the restaurant, remain the same).
e. How does this new piece of information affect your calculations in the expenditure approach? Explain.
Business
1 answer:
tekilochka [14]3 years ago
7 0

A) Product Approach

GDP = Value added of all industries

Value added = revenue - intermediate costs

Value added coconut producer = $20,000,000 (it does not have intermediate costs)

Value added restaurant = $30,000,000 - $12,000,000 (cost of coconuts)

                                        = $18,000,000

Value added government = $5,500,000 (collected in taxes, $3 million from the restaurant, $1.5 million from the coconut producer, and $1 million from consumers).

GDP = $20,000,000 + $18,000,000 + $5,500,000

        = $43,000,000

B) Expenditure Approach

GDP = Consumption + Investment + Government Spending + Net Exports

Consumption = $8,000,000 in coconuts + $30,000,000 in meals

                       = $38,000,000

Investment = $0

Government Spending = $5,500,000 in government wages

Net Exports = $0 (it is a closed-economy)

GDP = $38,000,000 + $0 + $5,500,000 + $0

       = $43,500,000

C) Income Approach

Wages = $14,500,000

Corporate Profits  = $24,000,000

Interest income = $500,000

Taxes = $4,500,000

GDP = $43,500,000

e. How does this new piece of information affect your calculations in the expenditure approach? Explain.

GDP under the expenditure approach, would rise by the value of the unsold coconuts ($1 million) as long as the coconuts were harvested in the given year. This is because inventory produced in the given year, is part of that year's GDP.

You might be interested in
Rico does not work for Street Bikes Company, but wrongfully obtains inside information concerning the firm. Based on the informa
Juli2301 [7.4K]

Answer: The misappropriation theory

Explanation:

 The misappropriation theory is basically describe about the various types of security fraud violation against the data source.

It is basically uses for the insider trading and when the individual person misusing the confidential data or information and also violating all the securities laws.

According to the question, the given argument is basically describe about the misappropriation theory.

Therefore, The misappropriation theory is the correct answer.  

5 0
3 years ago
A small craft store located in a kiosk expects to generate annual cash flows of $6,800 for the next three years. At the end of t
Dafna11 [192]

Answer:

The monetary value is $24,201.23

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

Cash flows:

Year 1= $6,800

Year 2= 6,800

Year 3= 6,800

Year 4= $15,000.

The discount rate is 15 percent.

We need to discount each cash flow to the present value:

PV= FV/(1+i)^n

Year 1= 6,800/1.15= 5,913.04

Year 2= 6,800/1.15^2= 5,141.78

Year 3= 6,800/1.15^3= 4,471.11

Year 4= 15,000/ 1.15^4= 8,576.30

Total= $24,201.23

6 0
3 years ago
A company was the victim of several frauds that totaled approximately $10 million in one year. With a profit margin of 10 percen
Arisa [49]

Answer:

100,000

Explanation:

Given that

Approximately frauds = $10 million

Profit margin = 10%

And the sale value of the product per unit = $1,000

So by considering the above information, the additional units is

= Approximately frauds × Profit margin

= $10 million × 10%

= 100,000

So by multiplying the approximate frauds with the profit margin we can get the additional units

8 0
3 years ago
Which members of OPEC would be the most likely to favor high oil prices now because of their small percentage of the world prove
solmaris [256]

The members of OPEC that would be in favor of high prices due to the small oil reserves that they have would be the countries in Africa

  • Ecuador
  • Angola
  • Tunisia
  • Gabon

<h3>What is OPEC?</h3>

This is an organization of the petroleum producing countries of the world.

Due to a rise in the oil prices now, these nations would most likely be favored in the sales of their products

Read more on OPEC here: brainly.com/question/26412451

6 0
2 years ago
The better-off test for evaluating whether a particular diversification move is likely to generate added value for shareholders
Arada [10]

Answer:  Has competitively valuable value chain match-ups with the company's present businesses such that its businesses can perform better together than apart.

Explanation:

The better-off test of diversification is that the company must gain a return that is higher than incremental growth. Incremental growth is usually defined a 1 + 1 = 2 formula and this test argues that Diversification must provide more than this such that the company achieves synergistic growth ( 1 + 1 = 3) which is what happens when different entities work better together than alone.

Diversification should therefore be into an area that will be able to match-up with the company's present businesses such that its businesses can perform better together than apart and produce even greater returns.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Sameer does not smoke. Every day he walks past a billboard advertising Camel cigarettes. In class, the instructor was talking ab
    11·1 answer
  • The use of mathematical tools such as the application of linear programming for optimizing operations and the statistical proces
    9·1 answer
  • What are five foundations of economics?
    10·1 answer
  • A method often used by economists to look at distribution of income in a society's economy involves:__________
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements about capitalism and socialism is correct?
    14·1 answer
  • Adina deposits $1,000 in the bank. The bank can then use her savings to make _____ to/for _____.
    6·2 answers
  • A monthly fixed rate mortgage payment
    9·1 answer
  • HIIIIIIIIII IN THE CAR
    14·2 answers
  • Suppose the seventh carrot you consume provides a marginal utility of 3 utils and the eighth carrot provides a marginal utility
    5·1 answer
  • By what date must taxes be filed in the united states?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!