Answer: First of all, we will add the options.
A. Yes, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
B. Yes, because the regression equation is based on a random sample.
C. Yes, because the association between length and weight is positive.
D. No, because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
E. No, because there may not be any 3-inch fish of this species in the pond.
The correct option is D.
Step-by-step explanation: It would not be appropriate to use the model to predict the weight of species that is 3 inches long because 3 inches falls above the maximum value of lengths in the sample.
As we can see from the question, the model only accounts for species that are within the range of 0.75 to 1.35 inches in length, and species smaller or larger than that length have not been taken into consideration. Therefore the model can not be used to predict the weights of fishes not with the range accounted for.
Answer:
=3
Step-by-step explanation:
-5+8
=3
4x = 157.2
4x/4 = 157.2/4
x = 39.3
Answer:
- Question 1a. i)

- Question 1a. ii)

- Question 1b)

Explanation:
<u><em>Question 1 a. i) Find the value of x.</em></u>

For the smalll triangle you can write:

For tthe big triangle:

Substitute:

Solve for x:

<u><em>Question 1a ii) Find the volume of the frustrum</em></u>
- Find the volume of a cone with height = 2.7m + 1.8m = 4.5m, and radius = 2.5m
Formula:

Substitute:

- Find the volume of a cone with heigth = 1.8m and radius = 1m

- Subtract the volume of the small cone from the volume of the big cone

<u><em>Question 1b. Calculate the volume of the bin</em></u>
<u>i) Upper frustrum</u>
This is the same frustrum from the equation of above, thus ist volume is 27.6m³.
<u>ii) Lower frustrum</u>




<u>iii) Add the volume of the two frustrums</u>
3x+12=5x-21
-5x -5x
-2x + 12 = -21
-12 -12
-2x=-33
x = 16.5