It could or it could not, it depends entirely on what they change in their thinking.
Usually no.
"You can spend your money without having to withdraw cash first" makes a checking account more convenient that a savings account. The correct option in regards to the given question is option "D". In savings account it is never possible to spend money first without having to withdraw cash first. It is also not right to say that checking account holders earn more interest than a savings account holder. The checking account is simply like a current account and so there is no chance of earning more interest than the savings account. The checking account allows numerous withdrawals and unlimited deposits while this is not possible with a savings account.
Answer:
No, a reversal of a ruling shall not be given a retroactive application if it will be prejudicial to the taxpayer.
Explanation:
Based on the information provided it can be said that No, a reversal of a ruling shall not be given a retroactive application if it will be prejudicial to the taxpayer. Meaning that the BIR can not assess ABC Printers for back taxes because ABC Printers was following the rulings made by BIR at that time correctly, the change in ruling applies to taxes only after the change has been made and not before. Therefore as long as ABC Printers begins paying taxes now, then the BIR has no standing.
Finance Charge = Balance x Interest rates
Since Philip has passed the full year since the initial credit, we use the full 19% for the calculation.
So, the finance charge is:
$ 2,000 x 19%
= $ 380
Answer:
False
Explanation:
False because the income, expenses accounts are closed to profit and loss account or income summary.
they are closed by transferring the credit balances in revenue a/c and debit balnace in expenses a/c to clearing account income summary.
The assets and liabilities , common stock, equity account are not closed.
