Answer:
Explanation:
Raw data (in $):
August September
Sale 235,000 1.3 × 235,000 = 305,500
- Cash collected 40% 60% of 235,000
40% of 305,500
Purchase 185,000 205,000
- Cash paid 30% 70% of 185,000
30% of 205,000
Beginning cash balance on September 1: $8,600
<u>Calculations: </u>
The change of the cash balance on September will be the cash collected during the month less the cash paid during the month:
- Cash collected: 60% × $235,000 = $141,000
40% × $305,000 = $122,200
- Cash paid: 70% × $185,000 = $129,500
30% × $205,000 = $61,500
<u>Ending cash balance of September 30:</u>
- Beginning cash balance + cash collected - cahs paid
- $8,600 + $141,000 + $122,200 - $129,500 - $61,500 = $80,800
Answer:
$45,000
Explanation:
Equipment cost: $165,000
We substract first the residual value of $15,000
Depreciable amount = $165,000 - $15,000
= $150,000
By the straight-line method, we divide the depreciable amount by the number of useful life years to obtain the depreciation per year:
Depreciation per year = $150,000 / 10 years
= $15,000
The equipment was purchased in 2021, it means that 3 years will have passed by the end of 2023. To find the depreciation expense at this moment in time we multiply the previous number by three.
Depreciation for 2023 = $15,000 x 3
= $45,000
Answer:
a. scientific management
Explanation:
Scientific management -
Scientific management is also refers to as Taylorism .
According to this management practice , the work is analysed and synthesized in an appropriate manner and fashion , is referred to as scientific management.
The scientific experiments are conducted with proper procedure and management.
Hence , from the given information of the question,
The correct term is a. scientific management .
Answer:
a)gathering information
c)considering options
d)weighing disadvantages
Explanation:
Basically, before decisions are made, one needs to gather information, consider options, weight the disadvantages of the option, then take action.
Answer:
The interpretation of the discussion is characterized throughout the explanation segment below.
Explanation:
- I acknowledge that perhaps the method of Inter Product seems to be powerful but instead accurate. It would have seemed that individuals take into account the registered proprietor to the implementation including its brand products, this same involvement of the company throughout the acquisition of preference as well as the strength of the product. Perceived value seems to be impossible to determine throughout the recognition of how to purchase intention can vary significantly dramatically.
- That frequency is being used to dismiss advertising money directly to incorporate value, reflecting the brand's likelihood of encountering difficulties. In terms of improving their methodologies, I will also have to maintain the integrity including its product would have been a small amount of about their overall valuation, even though there's a ton of objective reality here.