The most clear hypothesis for Western Rome's breakdown nails the tumble to a line of military misfortunes supported against outside powers. Rome had gone head to head with Germanic clans for quite a long time, however by the 300s "barbarian" bunches like the Goths had infringed past the Domain's outskirts. In 476 C.E. Romulus, the remainder of the Roman emperors in the west, was ousted by the Germanic chief Odoacer, who turned into the primary Barbarian to control in Rome. The request that the Roman Domain had brought to western Europe for a very long time was no more. the Germanic chief Odoacer organized a revolt and dismissed the Emperor Romulus Augustulus. From that point on, no Roman emperor could until kingdom come rule from a post in Italy, driving numerous to refer to 476 as the year the Western Domain endured its final knockout. All in all, the Roman domain succumbed to numerous reasons, yet the 5 fundamental ones were attacks by Barbarian clans, Financial difficulties, and overreliance on slave work, Overexpansion and Military Spending, and Government debasement and political unsteadiness.
your welcome :)
A reason for the increase was transportation. In the sixteenth century new forms of transportation and boats were developed.
Typically a ruler of a country or power with absolute authority is called a dictator.
With The Soviet Unions collapse, The US's main enemy that it had been opposed to for years was no longer occupying its time. Very quickly, the US turned its focus towards the many terrorist factions in the middle east, some of which it had facilitated. This lead to things like 9/11 and the Iraq war. Additionally, all the territory that had been previously been controlled by the Soviet Union near the middle East (Kazakhstan) were released and left to their own devices.
