Answer:
D) 137000 39000
Explanation:
Allen 140,000
Daniel 40,000
Capital before admission 180,000
share ratio 3:1
Capital after admission:
180,000 + 40,000 = 220,000
David participation: 20%
220,000 x 20% = 44,000
David investment 40,000
goodwill: 4,000
There is a difference in goodwill which will be supported for the old partner as their current share ratio
Allen 4,000 x 3/4 = 3,000
Daniel 4,000 x 1/4 = 1,000
Capital after David admission:
140,000 - 3,000 = 137,000
40,000 - 1,000 = 39,000
Answer:
a. 11.88%
b. -3.68%
Explanation:
Given that
Risk free rate = 6%
Beta = 1.4%
Market rate = 10.2%
Risk free rate = 6%
Alpha return = 8.2%
a. The computation of expected return of portfolio is given below:-
= Risk free rate + Beta (Market rate - Risk free rate)
= 6% + 1.4% (10.2% - 6%)
= 11.88%
b. The calculation of Alpha of portfolio is shown below:-
= Alpha return - Expected return
= 8.2% - 11.88%
= -3.68%
Answer:
The process of making this decision By the CLASSICAL MODEL of decision making
Explanation:
The classical general equilibrium model was developed in the 18th century within the neoclassical economics and it is related to classical economics.
The classical general equilibrium model aims to describe the economy by taking an aggregate of the behavior of individuals and firms.
Decision taken using this Method is usually based on what the eyes are seeing. Facts.
From the text, Ola buys new bikinis weekly based on the designs the customers are buying more. He decides on what to buy for the new week by looking at the designs that his customers went for the previous week. This is a clear case of Classical model of Decision making.
Answer:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $3 per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $2 per bottle. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on producers.
Explanation:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 ($3 + $2).
The burden on consumers is $3 ($9 - $6), which is the difference between the after-tax purchase price and the before-tax purchase price for consumers. This implies that the burden passed to consumers is $3 out of the total tax burden of $5.
The burden on producers is $2 ($6 - $4) which represents the difference between before-tax selling price and the after-tax selling price for the producers. This means that the burden passed to producers is $2 out of the total tax burden of $5.
If the tax burden were passed to the producers alone, the selling price would have been more than $11 ($6 + 5). This would have reduced demand for wine as consumers would have been forced to bear the total burden. This would have made the tax unequitable. This would have been the case unless demand is inelastic. That means that the total demanded is not sensitive to price increases.
