Answer:
He will get nothing from the Accidental Policy.
Explanation:
- Raymond owns an Accidental policy but he Dies from Coronary artery disease. according to insurance companies policy, he will get nothing when he is dead by any means other than by accident.
- Insurance companies have their own regulations and policy.
- The insurance company is liable to pay for the incident for which the insurance is taken.
Answer:
See below
Explanation:
From the above information, we can deduce that the stock owned by Carol and Dave falls in value by $2,000 I.e ($10,000 - $8,000) ; it is to be noted that Carol solely has realised and recognized loss of $2,000.
Here, one of the cogent factors that determines whether a sale has taken place is if realization has been effected. Here, stock sold by Carol qualifies as a disposition while the decline in the value of stock sold by Dave does not qualify as disposition.
With regards to the foregoing, we can conclude that the federal income tax law treat the decline in the value of the stock differently for Carol and Dave.
Answer:
d) Avoidable costs are also known as sunk costs.
Explanation:
The avoidable cost are those cost that can be ignored while making decision. The sunk costs are all those cost which already been incurred and it will not be effected by the change in decision. The sunk costs are already been expensed so, whatever decision you make it will not be changed.
Answer:
The correct option is C,the funds have a positive cost that is less than new equity issues.
Explanation:
Retained earnings have costs attached to it because the common stockholders expect that the company would use its retained earnings effectively such that is able to pay dividends at year or in such a way that the company's stock share price appreciates(capital gains yield)
However, the cost of retained earnings is lower when compared with new equity issues since the new issue would require issue costs such as regulatory fees as well as underwriter's commission.
