1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Art [367]
3 years ago
7

How many justices must agree to an opinion for the Supreme Court to issue a decision?

Social Studies
2 answers:
Anit [1.1K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

<u>At least five justices</u>

Explanation:

Following the hearings of a case, the Supreme Court holds a meeting to discuss the case. In such a meeting, each of the nine judges expresses their views, concerns, and questions about the case, and then vote to make a decision. Only if the decision is agreed by at least five of the nine Justices, the decision is delivered in open Court and becomes valid. If for some reason, there are not nine justices but eight, and there is a tie vote, the decision of the lower Court that previously dealt with the case shall prevail.

Montano1993 [528]3 years ago
3 0
I'm 90% sure it's 5 out of the 9.
You might be interested in
Assume you are the CEO of Black Diamond, a global organization. You realize that some of the people in your organization are hig
Julli [10]

<u>Answer: </u>

In the given case, I would assign members to the team who come from a similar culture.

<u>Explanation: </u>

  • In order to ensure the success of an important task that has to be inevitably carried out by a team, it would be necessary to constitute the team by including only the individuals that bear an utter sense of cooperation and understand how important it is to accomplish the task within the stipulated time.
  • To constitute such a team, it would require an intelligent coordinator who is aware of the behavioral traits and attributes of the employees working under him.
4 0
3 years ago
HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I WILL GIVE 25 POINTS!!!!!
Free_Kalibri [48]

Answer:

No

Explanation:

Sanctuary Cities are abhorrent at best, and the reason is simple. One could back these ideas purely on principal, but instead the state and local governments that enact these sanctuary laws are doing so with only political motivation in mind. Much like every mass shooting, or every time something bad happens in our nation. The political dilemma we face is that these acts or carried out without pure intentions.

Pandering to a base by way of violating laws sets a terrible precedent going forward. it suggests that here our laws are different and "that line in the sand can move". what is a nation of laws which doesn't enforce them. The answer is a nation without a spine. A law is a law, and while one might disagree with the laws, and that is why we have a proper way of enacting changes we want to see done in our great nation.

This has been done with Marijuana in multiple states already, however cities and local governments do not hold a vote to allow residents to have a say. No, instead they declare the city as being a sanctuary, and depend on mob rule to force those who oppose into silence or to force them out of the city entirely.

If we want to make it easier for people to attain visas and green cards, let's have that discussion and vote on it. if we want to make the US open borders, let's have a discussion and vote on it. but to simply say "to hell with you" and violate the law of the land without the say so from the citizens of state and local municipalities is mob rule at best and a violation of the oathes of offices taken by those we elect into those offices.

Personally, I believe that it is too hard for immigrants to attain visas and green cards, and that isn't to mention the financial cost ranging in the thousands for a single person going through this process. I believe this system requires change and needs revision, but it is wrong to declare sanctuary cities and states. one because it is done with motivation of pandering to a base for political gain, and lastly it sets a precedent for lawlessness in our greater country and local and state governments.

If we are to be a nation of laws, then we must be a nation of laws and not lawlessness. If we are to be a nation of suggestions, then we should carry on as we are currently doing. I love to do what feels right, but it must be done in the right way, otherwise you add fuel to the fires of division in our nation, and as Abraham Lincoln once famously stated; "A divided house cannot stand".

5 0
2 years ago
Which of the following is an example of the idea of "separation of powers" in the American constitutional system?
gladu [14]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Hope this helped

3 0
3 years ago
Watson to the study of learning?
alekssr [168]

Answer:

E.He demonstrated how some emotions and behaviors can be learned by classical conditioning.

Explanation:

Watson in his theory of behaviourism believes that a childs behaviour and character is learned or influenced by his or her environment. thus when a child is conditioned to a particular environment, his behaviour and emotional response will be influenced by what is prevailent in that environment. Watson believes that the environment has much more influence over an individuals behaviour more than genetic make up.

4 0
3 years ago
Under the Constitution, who shares the power of making laws?
spayn [35]
I believe it is B the president and the judiciary branch

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Assuming that people act in rational ways, what psychological model of health behavior specifies several factors that determine
    12·1 answer
  • Gunshot wounds, bullet holes, and cartridge casings indicating that a firearm was discharged are examples of what type of eviden
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a biotic factor in an ecosystem?
    9·2 answers
  • In the early-2000s, Mexico has openly encouraged programs to improve the country’s technology. Which of these has been the BIGGE
    6·1 answer
  • How is gravity related to mass and distance? Choose ALL the statements that apply.
    8·1 answer
  • Discuss how international organizations (e.g., the United Nations and World Bank) have effected political outcomes in Third Worl
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT a fundamental assumption of conversation analysis?
    14·1 answer
  • Fill in the following chart showing what reforms (changes) were made by the three leaders. There can be more than one leader.
    12·1 answer
  • Will give brainly
    10·1 answer
  • Explain the difference between a citizen’s right and a citizen’s responsibility. Use examples that describe the personal, politi
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!