<span>With the emergence of the industrial Revolution, many
changes were made in the living patterns of people in the cities. More people started to migrate to the cities
for better opportunities. As a result
livelihood started to shift from farms to factories. Unfortunately with mass migration came
overpopulation. Many of those who
traveled to the cities were now living in cramped living quarters and tried to
make the most of it. One of the negative
changes was the increase in pollution especially in air and water. Rivers started
to filled with trash and refuse from factories and from residents who live in
the cities. Polluted water and poor
living conditions also led to emergence of diseases like tuberculosis. This prompted the government to improve the
sewage and treating the water supply as well banning tenements.</span>
Answer:
d
Explanation:
The other choices are unrelated and will not really show how many people are moving to a country.
The migration rate is the difference between the number of immigrants and the number of emigrants per year, which is what we are looking for.
Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
Answer:
Cultural patterns explain much variation.
Explanation:
According to Thomas So well, while studying the intelligence scores of various people, concluded that, Cultural patterns explain much variation. This implies that, the cultural background of individual, such as how people were raised and their cultural differences has a significant influence, on their responses or answer to an intelligence test, which made the intelligence scores to vary as well.
Hence, since individual are all raised differently, most significantly from one cultural background to another, the way we read, evaluate and answer questions are different, and has significant effect on our scores.
Therefore the right answer is Cultural patterns explain much variation.
