It can be noisy and distracting to students to listen to audio speakers when there are multiple computers in the classroom. Headphones help the students
Answer:
C
data converted from double to integer.
Answer:
Option 3 is the correct answer.
Explanation:
- In c, c++ or Java programming language, The for loop takes three parameters in which first is an initialization, second is condition check and the third is an increment. None of the other loop (except for loop) takes three parameters. The other loop takes only one parameter and that is the condition check.
- So when a user knows about the times of iteration then it is a good choice to use the for loop but when the person does not know about the times of iteration if the loop. It means the iteration of the loop is based on the condition then it is a good choice to chose while or Do-while loop.
- The above question wants to ask which loop for a user can best if he familiar with the iteration of the loop then the answer is for loop which is started from option 3. Hence Option 3 is the correct answer while the other is not because--
- Option 1 states about the do-while loop which takes condition only.
- Option 2 states about the while loop which also takes condition only.
- Option 4 states about the infinite loop which is not any loop.
- Option 5 states about none of these which is not correct because option 3 is the correct answer.
Solution:
The process of transaction can guarantee the reliability of business applications. Locking resources is widely used in distributed transaction management (e.g; two phase commit, 2PC) to keep the system consistent. The locking mechanism, however, potentially results in various deadlocks. In service oriented architecture, the deadlock problem becomes even worse because multiple transactions try to lock shared resources in the unexpectable way due to the more randomicity of transaction requests, which has not been solved by existing research results. In this paper, we investigate how to prevent local deadlocks, caused by the resource competition among multiple sub-transactions of a gl obal transaction, and global deadlocks from the competition among different global transactions. We propose a replication based approach to avoid the local deadlocks, and a timestamp based approach to significantly mitigate the global deadlocks. A general algorithm is designed for both local and global deadlock prevention. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our deadlock prevention approach. Further, it is also proved that our approach provides higher system performance than traditional resource allocation schemes.
This is the required answer.
