a. section 2.1 will make the president commander-in chief of the armed forces. This ensures civilains control of the military.
b. Section 1.6 Sucession
c. State of the Union Address
Answer:
The Mormons greatly benefited from this as they were find a place where they were free of religious persecution, Utah. In addition, larger slave owners' political power increased, newer landowners and homesteaders, hunters, trappers, and other people whose profession depended upon the land, and writers who had a whole new genre to draw from all benefited.
Explanation:
I hope that this helped you for your question.
Answer:
Indirect characterization
Explanation:
Indirect characterization shows the personality traits of a character to the audience by describing their words and actions instead of telling what their personality is like.
Answer:
As more books were able to be produced, the demand for books increased.
Explanation:
Your Answer: is the emeritus William Robertson Coe Professor of History and American Studies and professor of political science and law at Stanford. He is the author of six books, including Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution (1996), which won the Pulitzer Prize in History. And, he is a past president of the Society for the History of the Early American Republic.
Michael Rappaport is the Hugh and Hazel Darling Foundation Professor of Law, and the Director of the Center for the Study of Constitutional Originalism at the University of San Diego School of Law. He previously worked in the Office of Legal Counsel in the U.S. Department of Justice. He’s the author of Originalism and the Good Constitution co-written with John McGinnis.
Jeffrey Rosen is the President and Chief Executive Officer of the National Constitution Center, the only institution in America chartered by Congress “to disseminate information about the United States Constitution on a nonpartisan basis.”
Explanation: Your Explanation In early August 1787, the Constitutional Convention’s Committee of Detail had just presented its preliminary draft of the Constitution to the rest of the delegates, and the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists were beginning to parse some of the biggest foundational debates over what American government should look like. On this episode, we explore the questions: How did the unique constitutional visions of the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists influence the drafting and ratification of the Constitution? And how should we interpret the Constitution in light of those debates today? Two leading scholars of constitutional history – Jack Rakove of Stanford University and Michael Rappaport of the University of San Diego School of Law – join host Jeffrey Rosen. Hope this Helps! :D Happy Early Christmas! :D
