A tax cut that will last for only a year will not have a huge effect on the aggregate demand as the aggregate demand increases only when the tax cut is permanent.
The given statement is false.
<h3>What is a tax?</h3>
A tax is a liability imposed on the taxpayer to pay a specified sum to the government based on the income they have earned in the previous year.
When the cutting of taxes becomes permanent in the country, then the citizens can start to acquire more which will increase the spending. The families will expect that the tax cuts are for the longer term which now induces them to buy and spend more and also act as an addition to their incomes. This whole impact would eventually lead to rising in aggregate demand.
Therefore, the demand increases when the tax cuts are permanent rather than when tax cuts are for only one year.
Learn more about the tax cut policies in the related link:
brainly.com/question/13924294
#SPJ1
Answer:
a. Firm M probably has a higher dividend payout ratio than Firm N.
Explanation:
The dividend payout ratio is commonly referred to a portion of the net income of the company which is paid to the various shareholders in dividends. Therefore, if we consider the statements made in the question, Firm M has a higher annual net income while the annual net income of Firm N is fluctuating, we can conclude that the dividend payout ratio of Firm M is more than that of Firm N.
Answer:
The answer is talking to a local environmental group for solutions.
Explanation:
This option is the best one for Juanita and Sam to take since they both need someone who have more expertise in this field to help them determine the best solution to the problem that they encounter, which is sea trash. The other options are unsuitable because they do not provide direct impact (such as picketing the guilty factory), unrealistic (lobbying their elected representatives), or have been done (identifying the changes and problem).
Answer:
please explain english we dont understand
Explanation:
Answer:
5.38 %
Explanation:
WACC = Cost of Equity x Weight of Equity + Cost of Debt x Weight of Debt
where,
Cost of Equity = 9.00 % (given)
After tax Cost of Debt = 6% x (1 - 0.21) = 4.74 %
Market Value of Equity = 1/5 x $13 million = $2.6 million
Weight of Equity = $2.6 million / $11.6 million = 0.22
Weight of Debt = $9 million / $11.6 million = 0.76
therefore,
WACC = 9.00 % x 0.22 + 4.74 % x 0.76
= 5.38 %
thus
the company’s WACC is 5.38 %
