Answer:
The correct answer is b) a Ponzi scheme.
Explanation:
The Ponzi Scheme is a fraudulent investment operation that involves paying investors interest obtained from the money of new investors (and not from the generation of genuine profits). It is a pyramidal system, in which the only way to share benefits requires that participants recommend and capture (refer) to more clients with the objective that new participants produce benefits to primary participants.
This system does not invest in financial or other instruments, it only redistributes money from some investors to others, so the system works only if the number of investors in the pyramid continually grows; once people stop entering the "business", the scammer is prevented from fulfilling his promise and the pyramid collapses
Answer:
If a large Number of Lakeview residents are questioned, about 44% of them will be Club fans.
Explanation:
Reporting the probability outcome of a singular observation are usually reported as stated above, that the probability of a random sample of Lakeview resident being a club fan is 0.44%. However from a long run relative frequency approach, it requires just more Than one random sample but a large number of samples being evaluated over time.
Hence to expresa as a long run relative frequency, it could be stated as ; report gathered from many Lakeview residents, about 44% of them are Club fans.
Insurance is a method of defense when it comes to managing your money according to Dave because it prevents you from incurring more debt.
<h3>How does insurance defend your money?</h3>
According to Dave Ramsey, a defense method in managing your money is one that helps you reduce or avoid debt.
Insurance is therefore a defense for managing your money because it saves you from having to incur debt when you pass through a dangerous situation because the insurance will pay out instead of you having to borrow.
Find out more on the purpose of insurance at brainly.com/question/1941778.
#SPJ1
<span>Technically, Kyle lied to Patrick about the time at which he would punch him. However, there is no contract to prove that this was what was said on the phone (heresay). Additionally, it does not mention that there was any sort of agreement or consideration made between the two of them regarding this. And even if there was, there might be a legality issue due to the fact that punching is both assault and battery when committed on a person, so the contract may not even be enforceable.
In terms of civil torts, Kyle didn't really commit anything that is pursuable in court, but did commit battery and assault. If Patrick fell or hit his head further and was injured/killed, he would be liable for an involuntary action, of which would be manslaughter if Patrick died. He would also be able to be sued for wrongful death by Patrick's family.</span>