Does anyone think im attractive just wanna know lol

Richland’s real GDP per person is $10,000, and Poorland’s real GDP per person is $5,000. However, Richland’s real GDP per person

dangina [55]

Answer:

It will take approximately 36 Years to Poorland to catch up to Richland.

Explanation:

Given data:

The GDP increase in Poorland per year = 1 %

The GDP increase in Richland per year = 3 %

Calculations:

Step 1: For Richland:

The formula for calculating the per year GDP increase for Richland is:

GDP = 10,000 + (10,000 x (1/100)) ---- (1)

GDP for first Year = 10,100$

GDP for second Year = 10,201 $

Similarly using the formula (1) we calculated the values for 10 and 20 years

GDP for 10th Year = 11046.2$

GDP for 20th Year = 12201.9$

Step 2: For Poorland:

The formula for calculating the per year GDP increase for Poorland is:

GDP = 5,000 + (5,000 x (3/100)) ---- (1)

GDP for first Year = 5,150$

GDP for second Year = 5,304.5 $

Similarly using the formula (1) we calculated the values for 10 and 20 years

GDP for 10th Year = 6719.6$

GDP for 20th Year = 9030.6$

Step 3: When will Poorland catch up to Richland:

By calculating values using the above formulas, we have found that for 38th year, Poorland will catch upto Richland and will have more GDP.

Poorland GDP for 36th Year = 14491.4$

Richland GDP for 36th Year = 14307.7$

6 0

3 years ago

The margin of safety is a measure of the distance between budgeted sales and the break-even point. It can be measured in dollars

Rudiy27

Answer:

The correct option is these statements are true

Explanation:

Margin of safety is the measure of the reduction in sales that needs to be recorded before a company makes no profit,invariably the difference the planned sales volume and the sales volume required to break even(makes no profit no loss).

The margin of safety can be expressed in volume,say 100 units of a product,in dollar terms ,say each product sells for $100 each,the margin of safety becomes $10,000($100*100) and can also be expressed in percentage terms depending on the way management wants it stated.

4 0

3 years ago

Kenny Electric Company's noncallable bonds were issued several years ago and now have 20 years to maturity. These bonds have a 9

murzikaleks [220]

Answer:

d. 5.08%

Explanation:

We have to first calculate the YTM of the bond, and then apply the tax shield.

To get the YTM we have to calculate the rate of return of an annuity of 46.25 for 20 years compounding semiannually at IRR rate and the present value of the face value redeem in 20 years.

$C \times \frac{1-(1+r)^{-time} }{rate} +Face\:Value/(1+rate)^{time}= PV\\$

$46.25 \times \frac{1-(1+IRR/2)^{-20*2} }{rate} + 1000/(1+IRR)^{20}= 1075\\$

IRR = 0.084656891 (it should be done using financial calculator or excel or a similar software program)

then we apply the shield tax to the IRR:

IRR x (1 - tax-rate) = Cost of debt

0.084656891 * ( 1 - 0.4) = 5.0794= 5.08

3 0

3 years ago

What reference is used to describe a township?

Alisiya [41]

أود أن تكون فإن الإحصائيات الثابتة والمتنقلة

6 0

2 years ago

Paradise Corp. has determined a standard labor cost per unit of $10.20 (1 hour × $10.20 per hour). Last month, Paradise incurred

bezimeni [28]

Answer:

Direct Labor Rate Variance = $825 favorable

Direct Labor Efficiency Variance = $510 favorable

Total Direct Labor Spending Variance = $1,335 favorable

Explanation:

The computations are shown below:

Direct Labor Rate Variance

= (Standard rate - Actual rate) × Actual hours

= ($10.20 - $16,005 ÷ 1,650 labor hours) × 1,650 direct labor hours

= ($10.20 - $9.7) × 1,650 direct labor hours

= $825 favorable

Direct Labor Efficiency Variance

= (Standard Hours allowed - Actual hours) × Standard rate

= (1,700 units × 1 hour - 1,650 hours) × $10.20

= (1,700 hours - 1,650 hours) × $10.20

= $510 favorable

Total Direct Labor Spending Variance

= Standard cost - actual cost

= 1,700 hours × $10.20 - $16,005

= $17,340 - $16,005

= $1,335 favorable

3 0

3 years ago