According to the assigned reading, in the united states, the amount of caffeine contained in an energy beverage must be stated on the label is false.
<h3>Energy drinks and caffeine:</h3>
The current regulation of items containing caffeine is inconsistent, does not serve the interests of consumers, and needs to be changed in a number of different ways. We argue in favor of one of the necessary legislative changes: the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) should mandate that the caffeine quantity be listed on the labels of all consumable items with added caffeine. Foods and beverages that contain caffeine are not currently obliged to list their caffeine amount on the label.
In addition to protecting people who are most susceptible to caffeine-related negative effects, strengthening these weak labeling regulations could increase consumer autonomy and efficient caffeine usage. Customers should be aware of how much caffeine is in the meals and beverages they consume because they have an interest in controlling their caffeine intake.
Learn more about caffeine here:
brainly.com/question/25576998
#SPJ4
Answer:
Chicken salad, refried beans, and guacamole
Explanation:
Answer: d. Confounding
Explanation:
In the context of a scientific study such as this one, a confounding factor is one that has influence on both the exposure and event variable(s), which may lead to over- or underestimation of the direct relationship between them (if any).
For instance: In this example, researchers may have had reason to believe that male gender is associated with both higher risk of obesity (the exposure variable) and adult-onset asthma (the event variable). If gender is not taken into account, one may claim that the finding of an association between obesity and asthma is simply an artifact due to the high proportion of male patients (likely to present with both). <em>Controlling</em> for that variable (such as by matching, as in this example) allows researchers to test for this hypothesis.
Answer:
Option D (Aversion therapy) is the appropriate choice.
Explanation:
- A type of behavioral treatment that involves aversive manipulation to mitigate or suppress the action of symptoms or conditions, combining harmful behavior or symptoms towards negative stimuli.
- Closely connected with aversive conditioning, another terminology is more often used. See conduct counseling for behavior modification.
Some other alternatives are also not relevant to the current situation presented. So, the solution is indeed the correct version.
