Answer:
Lafayette might have seen the extent to which slavery was practiced.
Explanation:
Marquis de Lafayette was a French military officer who commanded American troops during the America Revolutionary War, and returned back to France after the war.
On the invitation of President James Monroe and the United States Congress, Lafayette came back to the United States in 1824 to celebrate its upcoming 50th anniversary. During his visit, he was dissatisfied and disappointed when he found out that slavery existed in the parts of America that he visited; sights of slavery would have impelled him to make the statement.
Well I think they need to be able to write since most historians have to write a thesis in the career
In 1933, Congress repealed Prohibition with the twenty-first amendment (D). This happened on December 5th and alcohol was officially legal on December 15th. It is the only amendment to have been ratifying state conventions, all other amendments have been ratified by state legislatures. Although alcohol only became legal on December 15th, people started drinking openly before this date.
ANSWER:
I’m assuming you are writing about factory life? I recommend using the template provided to guide with writing this article. It also mentions that you need to include those three points (daily life, conditions, and effect on woman)… Perhaps you could write from the perspective of either a man or woman during this time period and mention the conditions (ex: like a daily/everyday routine on your life in the factory). Furthermore, to include effects on woman, I’m assuming woman had it much worse (so you can compare how your life as a “man” is different than those of “woman”).
Finally at the end, share/read aloud your article to anyone you know and get their reaction to the harsh or maybe even relatable experience to factory life/work.
Hope this helps clarify your assignment! Feel free to ask more questions if you need help.
Both readings communicate the fact that slavery is a sin or crime and that they will not render their support to any act of slavery .In the first reading the narrators outreach is more violent outreach while in the other reading the narrators opinion has a religious context.
Explanation:
Both the readings reflect the fact that slavery is and criminal in nature and its a sinful act to slave an individual ,the reading also indicate that they don t support such practice. Both the readings shows individuals dealing with the hardship of slavery and both the reading also display their protest against the Fugitive Slave Act.
Thus we can summarize that
Both readings communicate the fact that slavery is a sin or crime and that they will not render their support to any act of slavery .In the first reading the narrators outreach is more violent outreach while in the other reading the narrators opinion has a religious context.
