Answer:
Economic: Acquiring more land would've given more opportunity to current and future settlers. Reaching coast to coast would be better for trade, as well as getting people to settle in these areas with like the homestead act (easy to settle near sources of water and fertile land, rather than midwest)
Social: Manifest destiny is seen as a god given right to america at this point, each president that pushes it, believed and persuaded people into believing this. Reaching coast to coast is also a goal(Similar to like the moon landing) in its impact.
You can say that it is caused by the annexation of texas, mainly due to support for annexation began to form at this point. As well as their land disputes with britain, causing a rise in patriotism and the newly co'ined term 'manifest destiny'
Explanation:
Explanation:
As governance indicators have proliferated in recent years, so has their use and the controversy that surrounds them. As more and more voices are pointing out, existing indicators – many of them developed and launched in the 1990s – have a number of flaws. This is particularly disquieting at a time when governance is at the very top of the development agenda.
Many questions of crucial importance to the development community – such as issues around the relationship between governance and (inclusive) growth, or about the effectiveness of aid in different contexts – are impossible to answer with confidence as long as we do not have good enough indicators, and hence data, on governance.
The litany of problems concerning existing governance indicators has been growing:
Indicators produced by certain NGOs (e.g. the Heritage Foundation), but also by commercial risk rating agencies (such as the PRS Group), are biased towards particular types of policies, and consequently, the assessment of governance becomes mingled with the assessment of policy choices;
Many indicators rely on surveys of business people (e.g. the World Economic Forum's Executive Opinion Survey). While they have important insights into governance challenges given their interaction with government bureaucracies, the views of other stakeholders are also important and remain underrepresented, as are concerns about governance of less relevance to the business community (e.g. civil and human rights);
The other main methodology used are indicators produced by individuals or small groups of external experts – for example, the World Bank’s Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA), Bertelsmann’s Transformation Index, and the French Development Agency’s Institutional Profiles. This entails the risk that different experts ‘feed’ on each other’s ratings; and the depth to which external raters are able to explore the dimensions they are rating can vary.
The globalization is a process that has brought many positives in the world, in almost every country and among almost all people. Unfortunately, this process also has its negatives too, and of them is the fact that the safety of the people around the world has actually decreased. The main reason for this is that through the mass and social media, everyone can communicate with everyone, so violence and extremism is often spread out in this way to people thousands of miles away. The means of travel are enabling people from all over the world to be able to go anywhere they want, including the people that want to cause troubles and damage. Another thing that is of great concern is that through the mail, everything can be sent everywhere, including deadly chemicals and pathogens. The deadly diseases that were only local, now can easily be transferred to other continents in only few hours because people travel throughout the whole world. The evidence for the decline in safety can easily be seen in the ever growing terrorist attacks all over the globe, people that have caused the death of civilians because they have been recruited online over time, pathogens spreading out into places where they are not native, and almost daily packages and letters sent through the mail with explosives or deadly chemicals in them.
The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) hired Clarence Darrow to represent John T Scopes.
The Scopes Trial was a famous case during the 1920's that involved whether or not the theory of evolution should be taught in school. This case was focused around the idea of how do religion and science mesh in the public school setting. The ACLU hired Darrow for this case due to his incredible background and success as a defense attorney in the US.
The rise and fall of Islam
