Answer:
33.33%
Explanation:
If we divide the profit on the original price we get the procentual increase in price.
1/3=0,3333=33.33%
Explanation: Well, Lincoln did not respond directly to Taney's edict, but he did address the issue in his message to Congress that July. He justified the suspension through Article I, Section 9, of the Constitution, which specifies a suspension of the writ “when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.” So of course the answer is B). Lincoln suspended these rules because he felt it was necessary in order to put down the rebellion within the southern states. ❤️hope this helps❤️
I believe the answer is: <span> Tell her where to find the information that she needs.
Since that associate has the ability to finish the work herself, directly helping her would only prevented her from becoming responsible for their own duty.
But that being said, you still need to help her since she's most likely still a novice and does not fully understand the full job description. Because of this, telling her where she can find the information/instruction would be the best option.</span>
Answer:
The answer is "Option b".
Explanation:
Logically, the replacement of rule is the rule of substitution that could only lead to a specific part of the logical expression, it is identical phrases will start replacing each other within the structure of valid logic.
- It is the probabilistic reasoning, replacement laws are applicable to manipulate initiatives.
- This rule of inference is being used only for the whole linear combination, that can be substituted by a rule of substitution.
