All categories

2 years ago

What is the relative minimum of the function ?

Mathematics

2 answers:

ValentinkaMS [17]2 years ago

4 0

it would be the vertex which looks like it's (-3,-2)

PilotLPTM [1.2K]2 years ago

3 0

Answer:

Minimum of the function is -2.

Step-by-step explanation:

For any parabola which is in the form of y= +a(x-h)²+k

If the equation starts with positive notation then parabola will be like figure shown in the question and this parabola will have minimum value of the function.

And if the function starts with negative notation y=-a(x-h)²+k then parabola will have maximum.

Now the minimum value of the function is the y coordinate of its vertex means if vertex is (h, k) then k will be the minimum of the function.

Now from the figure of parabola vertex is (-3, -2).

So minimum of the parabola is "y coordinate of vertex" that is -2.

You might be interested in

Name a fourth point in plane TUY. x Y W Z

Elan Coil [88]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

F(x)=-x^2 find f(3)……………………………

Taya2010 [7]

Answer:

- 9

Step-by-step explanation:

$F(x)=-x^2 \\ \\ plug \: x = 3 \\ \\ F(3)=-(3)^2 \\ \\F(3) = - 9$

7 0

2 years ago

A rectangle has an area of 21 square centimeters. Which of the following could be the rectangle's length and width? Area = lengt

Juliette [100K]

Width=1cm and length=21cm or width=3cm and length=7cm.

3 0

3 years ago

Use a proof by contradiction to show that the square root of 3 is national You may use the following fact: For any integer kirke

Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

1. Let us proof that √3 is an irrational number, using reductio ad absurdum. Assume that $\sqrt{3}=\frac{m}{n}$ where $m$ and $n$ are non negative integers, and the fraction $\frac{m}{n}$ is irreducible, i.e., the numbers $m$ and $n$ have no common factors.

Now, squaring the equality at the beginning we get that

$3=\frac{m^2}{n^2}$ (1)

which is equivalent to $3n^2=m^2$ . From this we can deduce that 3 divides the number $m^2$ , and necessarily 3 must divide $m$ . Thus, $m=3p$ , where $p$ is a non negative integer.

Substituting $m=3p$ into (1), we get

$3= \frac{9p^2}{n^2}$

which is equivalent to

$n^2=3p^2$ .

Thus, 3 divides $n^2$ and necessarily 3 must divide $n$ . Hence, $n=3q$ where $q$ is a non negative integer.

Notice that

$\frac{m}{n} = \frac{3p}{3q} = \frac{p}{q}$ .

The above equality means that the fraction $\frac{m}{n}$ is reducible, what contradicts our initial assumption. So, $\sqrt{3}$ is irrational.

2. Let us prove now that the multiplication of an integer and a rational number is a rational number. So, $r\in\mathbb{Q}$ , which is equivalent to say that $r=\frac{m}{n}$ where $m$ and $n$ are non negative integers. Also, assume that $k\in\mathbb{Z}$ . So, we want to prove that $k\cdot r\in\mathbb{Z}$ . Recall that an integer $k$ can be written as

$k=\frac{k}{1}$ .

Then,

$k\cdot r = \frac{k}{1}\frac{m}{n} = \frac{mk}{n}$ .

Notice that the product $mk$ is an integer. Thus, the fraction $\frac{mk}{n}$ is a rational number. Therefore, $k\cdot r\in\mathbb{Q}$ .

3. Let us prove by reductio ad absurdum that the sum of a rational number and an irrational number is an irrational number. So, we have $x$ is irrational and $p\in\mathbb{Q}$ .

Write $q=x+p$ and let us suppose that $q$ is a rational number. So, we get that

$x=q-p$ .

But the subtraction or addition of two rational numbers is rational too. Then, the number $x$ must be rational too, which is a clear contradiction with our hypothesis. Therefore, $x+p$ is irrational.

7 0

3 years ago

What is the average monthly income for these weekly incomes: $256.00, $243.50, $252.05, $261.18, $225.93, $250.47

Vaselesa [24]

You add them all then divide the number by the total number of weekly incomes

8 0

2 years ago