1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
telo118 [61]
3 years ago
7

Why were there conflicts between farmers and cattlemen in the West during the 1800s? Cattlemen intruded on unfenced farmlands. C

attlemen kept the railroads from building where farmers needed them. Farmers fenced off grazing lands that they did not own. Farmers created a shortage of the barbed wire cattlemen needed to keep their herds safe.
History
1 answer:
lara [203]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The right answer is:

Cattlemen intruded on unfenced farmlands.

Explanation:

Conflicts happened in many states. There were the so-called the Fence Cutting Wars. At some point, cattlemen started to use barbed wire to fence their lands; farmers or smaller cattlemen saw this as improper taking of public lands and an obstacle to roads and began cutting the fences.

You might be interested in
whats in the blank help fast • Turmoil within Rome's ________ proved to be more dangerous to the Republic's stability.
Vikentia [17]

Answer:

economy.

Explanation:

In 133 BC, the turmoil within Rome's economy proved dangerous for the Republic's stability.

With the growing economy of Rome, the gap between the rich and poor of Rome grew. With this growing gap, grew tension and turmoil within Rome. At that time stood two brothers, Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus, to stand for poor farmers of Rome, but were killed. This growing tension in the economy provoked slave revolts and military precipitation in Rome which resulted in the Fall of the Republic.

8 0
3 years ago
Why would someone oppose imperialism and what were their motives?
mr_godi [17]
The anti imperialism league was founded on June 15 1898 in Boston. The anti imperialists opposed the expansion because they believed imperialism violated the credo of Republicanism
8 0
3 years ago
When looking at the feudal system, which is a notable difference between Japanese Samurai and European Knights?
Leviafan [203]

The feudal system is a term for the economic, political and social structures that governed Europe during the Middle Ages; but halfway across the world in Japan, very similar structures were in place.

In both cases, a class of peasant farmers formed the economic backbone; an honorable warrior class was the basis for military power, and civil order depended on a bond of personal loyalty between vassal and lord. Samurai pledged their service to a Daimyo (a powerful clan lord) who ruled the land on behalf of the Shogun – Japan's warlord in chief; just as European knights served barons and dukes whose authority derived from their king.

In Europe, the Middle Ages was an era of destructive conflict, with the Hundred Years War and the War of the Roses being prime examples. Similarly, the “Sengoku Age” - or “Warring States Period” - saw Japan plunged into political turmoil, as various clans sought to usurp the seat of the crumbling Ashikaga Shogunate.

The mythical reputations of the samurai and ninja - two popular icons derived from Japanese culture - are a product of this era. The former sought to win honor for their lords in glorious battle, while the latter waged war through assassination and subterfuge.

There was an event of religious conflict to rival that of Europe, as some clans chose to embrace the Christian influence introduced by newly arrived European explorers, while others vehemently resisted it.

But the feudal system was never even uniform across Europe, so it's unlikely to be so among cultures separated by such vast distance. For all the similarities on the surface, the deeper inspection reveals important differences in the values that governed political and economic relationships in Japan and Europe during their respective feudal periods.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the American people feel about going to war in Europe?​
Zinaida [17]

Answer:

For well-off white professionals who were part of the Progressive movement, Keene writes, taking an interest in the war in Europe was part of becoming “citizens of the world.” Some of them formed the Committee for Relief in Belgium (CRB). True to the technocratic orientation of Progressivism, they tackled the problem of helping civilians in German-occupied areas in practical terms, negotiating with both Germany and Britain to allow shipments of food and clothing past their military forces.

Explanation:

4 0
4 years ago
What danger of Western travel is Kellogg
svetlana [45]

Answer:the the threat of disease

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A budget deficit results when government outlays exceed its revenue. True False
    7·2 answers
  • In the 1964 case of Reynolds v. Sims, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that all state election districts must be ____.
    5·2 answers
  • From your reading, why do you think President Roosevelt believed America needed to expand its realm of influence?
    10·1 answer
  • He end of the 1800s why did the people fear that China might be split into different colonies?
    15·1 answer
  • What kinds of characteristics can be used to  describe a place?
    15·2 answers
  • What was the most important factor in making mesopotamia's farmland fertile?
    9·1 answer
  • Which is the best example of cultural diffusion?
    13·2 answers
  • Why was Suleiman's failure to take Vienna pivotal for Europe?
    11·1 answer
  • Help help help!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    12·1 answer
  • What was the first mention of slavery in the U.S. Constitution?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!