Answer: True
Explanation:
Under Agency Law in relation to employment, the salesperson is acting as an agent of the owner of the store and as such is their representative. As their representative, it is assumed that whatever they are selling is from the Owner whom they represent and as such can be binding on the owner.
This is why the Agent must act in the best interest of the owner because the owner could be held negligent for the actions of their agents. For instance, a salesperson will not be sued for a faulty equipment that caused harm but the store can.
Answer:
D) its revenue minus its cost of intermediate goods.
Explanation:
The firm value added shows a difference between the revenue and the cost of intermediate goods
In mathematically,
Firm value added = Revenue - cost of intermediate goods
After deducting the cost of intermediate goods from the revenue we can get the firm value added
Hence, the option D is correct as it denotes the firm value added
Answer:
Explanation:
United States savings bonds are debt securities issued by the United States Department of the Treasury to help pay for the U.S. government's borrowing needs. U.S. savings bonds are considered one of the safest investments because they are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States government.
This is a debit card
It's a simple card where you just use it to pay with money directly from your account. If you don't have money on your account, you can't pay. There's no credits or anything similar.
Answer:
The correct answer is the option A: unconscionable
Explanation:
To begin with, the reason why such prohibition from Marco to Fred is unconscionable is due to the fact that Marco already stated in a private contract that he agreed to sell the apartment to Fred by a certain price, therefore establishing that the property of the real estate now belongs to the other party, letting everyone else external to the contract know that the proper and new owner is Fred.
Secondly, it is understandable that now that Fred is the new owner of the apartment by contract then it is unfair and unreasonable that the old owner Marco prohibits him to do what he wants with the apartment.
