The comparison in the above section is a pair of white dancing shoes that had faded to a pale blue color.
<h3>
What does the word analogy mean in English?</h3>
A comparison of two objects is used to emphasize their similarities. (The items being compared are often physically dissimilar, but an analogy emphasizes how they are similar.)
Thus, in the said excerpt the analogy is shown in the line pair of white dancing shoes that had faded to a pale blue color.
Learn more about Analogies:
brainly.com/question/17874879
#SPJ1
Answer:
b as subjectively as possible
Explanation:
Reality is objective so a realist portrays life as obectively as possible thinking in a way as this is going to happen and we need to understand that.
In paragraph 114 of the Monkey Paw, Mrs. White told Mr. White to get the Monkey Paw and make a second wish. Mr. White wisely told her that the first wish was only a coincidence and the damage done was already enough.
Mrs. White was excited, feverish, and panting at the possibility of seeing her boy come back to life again. She insisted on having her way.
In the story, Monkey Paw, we learn of Mr. and Mrs. White who were visited by their soldier friend, Morris. He gave them a Monkey Paw from India that he said possessed the ability to grant their wishes.
He, however, warned them of the possible harmful consequences of using it. The couple wished for money to pay off their mortgage and their wish was granted in exchange for their son's life.
In Paragraph 114, we see Mrs. White excitedly thinking of making her son come back alive again with a second wish. Her husband wisely kicked against this.
Learn more about the Monkey Paw here:
brainly.com/question/12021069
Answer:
A new post-conflict chapter characterized not by bigotry but by national unity is being written in South Africa. Playing a key role in the rewriting, representation, and remembering of the past is the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission which, in 1996, started the process of officially documenting human rights violations during the years 1960-1993. This nation-building discourse of reconciliation, endorsed by both the present government and South Africa's ruling party, the African National Congress (ANC), has been a crucial agent of a new collective memory after the trauma of apartheid. But the confession of apartheid crimes proved beneficial mostly for perpetrators in search of amnesty rather than a genuine interest in a rehabilitated society. Thus, the amnesty system did very little to advance reconciliation. It is for these reasons that the South African TRC was cynically regarded by its critics as a fiasco, a "Kleenex commission" that turned human suffering into theatrical spectacle watched all over the world. There is, in fact, little that is "new" or "post" in a country that retains apartheid features of inequity. What is often overlooked in this prematurely celebratory language of reconciliation is South Africa's interregnum moment. Caught between two worlds, South Africans are confronted with Antonio Gramsci's conundrum that can be specifically applied to the people of this region: an old order that is dying and not yet dead and a new order that has been conceived but not yet born. And in this interregnum, Gramsci argues, "a great variety of morbid symptoms appear" (276). Terms like "new South Africa" and "rainbow nation," popularized by former president F.W. de Klerk and Desmond Tutu, the former chairperson of the TRC respectively, then, not only ignore the "morbid" aspects of South Africa's bloody road to democracy, but also inaccurately suggest a break with the past. This supposed historical rupture belies the continuities of apartheid.
scorn her.
