Answer and Explanation:
Jocasta explains that she does not trust the words of the prophets, because in the past, a prophet told her ex-husband that his son would kill him. In fear, her ex-husband drove the child out of the city and was killed years later, at a crossroads by a band of thieves, just before Oedipus arrived. This makes Oedipus very afraid, as it confirms the prophecy he received.
That's because Oedipus knows that he is not a legitimate child of the parents who raised him and that he was found as a baby. In addition, he killed a man near the crossroads to which Jocasta's ex-husband was killed. In that case, it is likely that he killed her husband and then married her, which proves the terrible prophecy he received that said he would kill his own father and lie with his own mother.
The correct answer here is the third option.
Satire is the style of writing employed by writers when they criticize the society in any form or humans in general. In the genre of satire all the follies, vices, shortcomings and abuses of the society or the individual are ridiculed, mocked but the main thing about the satire, even though it is funny and humorous, its main purpose is the betterment of the society and constructive social criticism.
Answer:
- helped
(trying to reach the character minimum lol)
hahshdjdjdkakdkkskaksjwjsjdjdkd
Answer:
Pensive is NOT being used correctly!
Explanation:
"Pensive" is defined as "engaged in, invloving or reflecting deep or serious thought". How does that have anything to do with bread prices? Clearly, the sentence is describing how the bread prices have rose to a very expensive amount, and pensive has nothing to do with a large amount of money.
If you liked this answer, I'd really appreciate it if you rated it and gave it a Thanks!
I hope this answer helped you! Have a great day and good luck with your schoolwork!
-KittenCat
In my first event ( The Black Lives Matter Movement), the article seemed very biased towards this movement, with during further intrest on the publisher, it showed that the publisher was pro All Lives Matter movement which is like the "rebuttle" for the BLM movement. Over all the article was very biased and against the BLM movement. The author had a link to an atricle posted on abortion. In this atricle he was very pro choice on this matter and seemed also bias on the fact of her body her chocie. Two different others teo different iew points.
Explanation:
switch up some words so u dont get caught cheating
