Answer:
what
Step-by-step explanation:
So, Katherine can do 0.1 of the job per hour. (if she needs 10 hours for the job, each hour she can do the whole divided by the time, so 1/10, which is 0.1)
if in two hours she and Marina can be done, then Marina will do 1(the whole job)-2/10 (twice as much as she can do in an hour)=0.8 of the job. So if Marina does 0.8 of the job in two hours, each hour she will do half of it: 0.4 - and this is the correct answer
Sophie would’ve earned more
She would’ve earned $37 more
Calculations:
Sophie:
$330(1+4%*2)
=$356
Simple interest: $356-$330
=$26
Avi:
$290(1+5%*2)
=$319
Simply interest: $319-$290
=$29
$29-$26
=$3
Answer:
A two-sided alternative hypothesis would be more appropriate in this case
Step-by-step explanation:
A one-sided hypothesis is one that asserts that a given parameter is either smaller than the null hypothesis value or larger than the value presented by the null hypothesis.
However in a two sided hypothesis, the claim is made that a given parameter is not equal to the parameter given in the null hypothesis, such that the parameter can be either larger than than or lesser than the value of the null hypothesis and still satisfy the condition of the hypothesis
Therefore, given for that for there to be a conclusion, the test should be weather the number of people that think of an odd number are equal to the number of people that think of an even number, or weather the number of people that think of an odd number are not equal to the number of people that think of an even number
Therefore, a two-sided hypothesis should be used since the claim (that the numbers are not equal) is not equal to the value of the parameter in the null hypothesis (that the numbers are equal)
10 and the math be hide it is 600/60=10
