2 because 8 divided by 4 is 2.
Answer:
To find the hypotenuse you need to use the Pythagorean Theorem which is
a^2+b^2=c^2
Where a and b are your two sides and c is your diagonal line
So you want to plug the numbers in for the right variables
5^2+12^2=c^2
We want to find what c equals so we are first gonna simplify
25+144=c^2
we take 5^2=25, and 12^2=144, then we add them together 25+144=169
169=c^2 now you want to take 169 and square root it because the opposite of squaring is taking it by the root square
The square root of 169=13
Your hypotenuse is 13
Hope this helps ;)
Answer:
A) there are 13 cards per suit and 4 suits, a total of 52 cards. So there are 13*2=26 red cards in a deck of 13*4=52, the odds of drawing a red card are 26/52=1/2=50%
B) Again outside knowledge is required, you name four suits but not their colors. Nonetheless, unless this is a very unusual deck, the diamonds and hearts are red, spades and clubs black. So that’s 2 red suits out of 4 suits. 2/4=1/2=50%
C) there are 2 black suits and 2 red suits. The odds of getting a red card are 2/(2+2)=2/4=1/2 or 50%
Each of those answers is a different way to figure the odds, they come out the same each time, as expected.
However, what if we assume that you mean… when drawing a 5 card poker hand? Or when Penn Jillette asks you “is this your card?”+ Or if you draw every card in the deck? Or if you are playing some macabre game in which you die if you draw the ace of spades but you may only stop drawing if you draw a red card?
There are myriad possible meanings to your question, I’ve just made the simplest assumption and given the odds on that… but my answer is woefully incomplete.
+ Hint, when Penn Jillette asks you “is this your card” your card is always the 3 of clubs. So… 0% chance.
Answer:
I solved it and my answer is - 2
Step-by-step explanation:
5x+6=8x+12
5x-8x =12 - 6
-3x =6
Divide by - 3
X=-2
Answer:
B) no, because the corresponding angles are not congruent
Step-by-step explanation:
Similar triangles must have proportional sides, as well as congruent corresponding angles. In this instance, we can see that the angles are not <em>congruent</em>, and so there is no need to solve for proportion.
~
