1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MArishka [77]
3 years ago
13

How was it possible for Neanderthal Man and Homo Sapiens to evolve as separate species?

History
1 answer:
masya89 [10]3 years ago
8 0

Geographic isolation and different living conditions.

Explanation:

Both the Neanderthal and the Homo sapiens shared the same ancestor, the Homo erectus. The Homo erectus managed to spread from Africa to Eurasia. The populations started to become geographically isolated from each other, and over time this caused speciation.

The Homo erectus from the far East, with the one from Europe, or the one from Africa, didn't had contact. This was due to big distance and natural barriers. Gradually this species was evolving, and because of the different living conditions and the geographic isolation at different places it started to develop different characteristics. This has led to evolution of different species over time, with the Neanderthal evolving in Eurasia, as well as the Denisovan Man, while in Africa it was the Homo sapiens that emerged.

You might be interested in
HELPPPP
VLD [36.1K]

Answer:

b

Explanation:

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
"The majority, oppressing an individual, is guilty of a crime, abuses its strength, and by acting on the law of the strongest br
Mnenie [13.5K]
<span>The rule of law is an essential principle in the nation but not nearly as important as the idea of majority rule. The rule of law is the most important principle in the nation where votes of the majority determine the laws. The rule of the majority with protection for the minority's rights is essential for preserving the liberties of all. The rule of the majority is the only principle on which this nation should run in order to protect democracy.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
How do third party candidates negatively impact national elections?
monitta

If you are convinced that a two party system is best for the country, then the negative impact of 3rd party candidates is that they siphon votes off of one or both of the main candidates. For instance, 3rd party candidate Ross Perot took votes away from George H. W. Bush in 1992, leading to a victory for the Democratic candidate Bill Clinton.

Others might argue, however, that 3rd party candidates are good for national elections. They raise issues for debate that might not be raised if only the two major parties were running.

4 0
3 years ago
Please help me Due 12:00 Pm please 1
Trava [24]

Answer:

B. Allowing the president to use military force without a declaration of war by congress.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What is the solution to the system of equations?<br><br> 2x+4y=12 y=1/4x-3
ASHA 777 [7]

Answer:

(8,-1)

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • ____ prevents unauthorized users from creating, modifying, or deleting information.
    9·1 answer
  • Can someone summarize this please?
    15·1 answer
  • Imagine you are a reporter conducting a unique interview. Moses, Jesus, and Muhammad are sitting around a table having lunch wit
    6·1 answer
  • The locks lowers ships to the level of the Pacific Ocean
    11·1 answer
  • At the national level, the United States has often been described as which type of state?
    13·1 answer
  • When was the declaration of Independence signed​
    15·1 answer
  • During World War I, the second phase in battles across enemy lines and no-man’s-land was
    9·2 answers
  • Propaganda and the indoctrination of young people was a major characteristic of totalitarian
    9·1 answer
  • What is an example of class inequality?
    13·1 answer
  • What was Chester Nimitz's main contribution to World War II?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!