1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
katen-ka-za [31]
3 years ago
5

take on the role of George Washington to formulate a written response to the battle of Great Meadows. This response needs to be

rooted in evidence
History
1 answer:
melomori [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The war tested the relationships between America and the mother country.  The decisions that arose from the conflict caused both the British and the Americans to question the nature of the colonial partnership.  After the French and Indian War, it began to become apparent that America and Britain were developing culturally and socially along different lines, and the war exposed and exacerbated the fundamental differences between British and American goals.

George Washington was a pivotal figure in the French and Indian War from the earliest days.  For Washington the French and Indian War started in late 1753, when he was selected as the British emissary to the French frontier establishment.  It ended with the fall of Fort Duquesne to the combined British and colonial forces.  He was a young and ambitious man when he volunteered.  His actions--which reflected his lack of experience--and his ambitions helped determine the course of the war.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which group founded Harvard College in 1636?
Burka [1]

Answer:

the Puritans

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What event led to the battle
zheka24 [161]

Answer:

1820 | The Missouri Compromise. This 1856 map shows the line (outlined in red) established by the Missouri Compromise. ( ...

1831 | Nat Turner's Rebellion. ...

1846 - 1850 | The Wilmot Proviso. ...

1850 | The Compromise of 1850. ...

1852 | Uncle Tom's Cabin. ...

1854 - 1859 | Bleeding Kansas. ...

1857 | Dred Scott v. ...

1858 | Lincoln-Douglas Debates.

Explanation:good luck

3 0
2 years ago
How did Charlemagne build and maintain power?<br>Option are in the picture.​
In-s [12.5K]

Answer:

34525321 brtgrt

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
a woman has been indicted for vandalism for putting graffiti on a wall. this is the second time she been accused of this crime.
Vedmedyk [2.9K]

Analyzing the scenario, we see that the situation is repeated by the second. It may be that the first time, the woman did not know. But she had already been accused before, that is, that the second time, this was considered intentional and malicious conduct.


According to the penal code § 594, this act is considered vandalism, that is the defacing of another’s property with graffiti “or other inscribed material,” or damaging or destroying another’s property and this cant be done negligently, with the will to do the damage.

If she convicted of felony vandalism again, the maximum prison sentence is three years (after being convicted before) and fines can be up to $10,000.  When the damage caused by the vandalism exceeds $10,000, the fines can be increased to $50,000. Then, comes the restitution (paying the owner property for the damage), and possibly community service.



6 0
3 years ago
NEED HELP QUICK 100 PTS
Slav-nsk [51]

Answer:

The US were against the government of Salvador Allende in Chile because he was a Marxist and they feared this would increase the influence of communism in the Western hemisphere.  

Explanation:

The United States intervened in the presidency of Salvador Allende and supported a military coup by Augusto Pinochet, that would lead to the death of Salvador Allende and the instillation of a military dictatorship in Chile that lasted from 1974-1990.  The actions that would actively undermine the Allende government were supported by the US government and the CIA because Allende had Marxist views that when against the liberal democracy ideals of the United States government. Intervention helped assure that there would not be a further spread of communism in Latin America that could threaten the sphere of influence of the United States. I think that the United States shouldn't intervene in the sovereign systems of other countries and that the US should have faced charges of human rights violations for the death of General René Schneider who the CIA paid $50,000 to have kidnapped and delivered weapons to the pro-coup factions who were after Schneider.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did many slaves and freedmen ally themselves with the British cause during the American Revolution?
    15·2 answers
  • What impact did the crusades have on the Eastern and Western worlds?
    7·1 answer
  • 3. Do you trust the account in this document? Why or why not? ​
    10·1 answer
  • Did the Gupta empire grow wealthy through decades of war and conquest?
    11·1 answer
  • Can someone please help me ASAP!?
    7·1 answer
  • The Earth’s ______ is important to the ongoing transformation of the surface. 1.core 2.rotation 3.crust 4.mantle
    15·1 answer
  • What shared belief of both Justinian and Charlemagne helped build cultural unity in Europe?
    11·1 answer
  • What inspired a second wave of the women’s movement
    14·1 answer
  • What is michael r pence employment experience
    13·1 answer
  • How did the kings of Ghana caise revenue; in other words, what was Ghana's taxation system?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!