Answer:
$26,000 adverse variance
Explanation:
Fixed Overheads Volume Variance = Budgeted Overheads at Actual Output - Budgeted Fixed Overheads
= $1.30 x 60,000 hours - $1.30 x 80,000
= $78,000 - $104,000
= $26,000 adverse variance
The fixed factory overhead volume variance is $26,000 adverse variance
<span>Assuming that we consider the standard workday of eight hours, each part would take 18.75 minutes per part completion. In order to complete 1,250 parts, it would take 8.33 days to complete. In order to complete the 1,250 parts, the manufacturer would have to create at least eight work stations to meet the daily demand.</span>
Answer:
C. To enforce property rights
Explanation:
Government intervention in market can be non materistically via regulation , materistically via taxes & subsidy.
Although the second materislistic way of tax, subsidy comes under the perview of 'Government Budget' .
Government budget is anual financial statement showing economy's expected revenue & expenditure .
Economic growth & stability by reallocation of resources , reducing income inequalities - reflect 'efficiency' & 'equity' as valid reasons .
Foreign protection is also not invalid depending upon the initial budding stage of a developing economy & its global stand. Eg - India 1950 to 1990 .
However all these are progressive legitimate reason for govt. Intervention .
But , enforcing property rights is a feature of 'socialistic (communistic) economy - which has its own demerits like loss of consumers soveireignity , lack of postive competitive efficiency , govt overburden.
Answer:
cutting taxes by $125 billion
Explanation:
given data
economy = 0.8
expenditure gap = $100 billion
to find out
cutting taxes
solution
we get here cutting or reduce taxes that is express as
cutting taxes = 
......................... 1
cutting taxes = 
solve we get cutting taxes
cutting taxes = $125 billion
so cutting taxes by $125 billion
Answer:
The answer is B
Explanation:
Top-down management or leadership which happen or occurs when the goals, objectives, tasks and projects are determined or evaluated among the firm or the company senior leaders, generally independently of their teams.
So, in this case, top executive working with the managers in order to develop or create their own goals. This approach is known as the top down leadership.And under this the tasks, projects are then communicated to the teams.
