Answer:
negligence per se
Explanation:
Negligence per se -
According to this offense , it is the breaking of the statute , which is applied to save the people from a particular type of danger or harm .
It is based on , the duty of care .
And , the duty of care , is determined by the jury under the normal negligence rules .
Similarly in the question , Ted hit Zoey accidentally and constitutes , negligence per se .
Answer:
$70,000
Explanation:
Moran Corporation
Semiannual interest paid on 31 Dec 2021
= $13,500,000*8%*6/12
= $540,000
Therefore If the effective interest method is used, by how much should the bond discount be reduced for the six months ended December 31, 2021 will be $70,000
Effective interest expense on 31 Dec.2021
= $12,200,000 * 10% * 6/12
= $610,000
Bond discount to be reduced for 6 months ended 31 Dec 2021
= $610,000 - $540,000
= $70,000
<span>MasterCard uses a history of credit card transactions to provide information for targeted marketing. marketing and business planning. For example, your bank may notice a customer purchasing numerous airline flights and generate an offer for a credit card that offers airline miles as a reward. It can also go directly to the airlines and negotiate a special offer or deal for it's cardholders.</span>
Answer:
C. it will sell its products only to people who agree to buy only from it and not from rival firms.
Explanation:
Generally, any business can choose its business partners. But, under certain circumstances, there are limits on this freedom for a firm with a big market power.
There is an attempting to define those limited situations when this kinds of firm may violate antitrust law:
- The first option is that it violate the antitrust law by refusing to do business with other firms, or do business but under certain requisites. The key here is how the refusal to deal helps the monopolist maintain its empire, or allows the monopolist make an strategy where its monopoly is use in another market to attempt to monopolize other market.
- They can also refuse to deal with customers or suppliers, what cause the effect of preventing them from dealing with a rival: "If you deal with my competitor, I refuse to deal with you."
- Also, regarding to a firm dealing with its competitors, if the monopolist refuses to sell a product or service to a competitor and it makes it available to others, or if the monopolist has done business with the competitor and then stops, then the monopolist needs a legitimate business reason for its actions.
8 C, 11 B, 13 D, 14 B, 20 B
