Answer:
accrued basis income: 14,300
cash basis income: 9,500
Explanation:
accrued: we reocgnize base on the time of transfer of goods and the expense are mathced when the period they occur.
revenues 33,700
operating expense <u> (19,400) </u>
net income 14,300
cash basis: we recognize based on the cash collection or disbursement:
collected from customer 25,900
paid expenses (13,600)
insurance paid <u> (2,800) </u>
net income 9,500
Answer:
A. Reject (Alternative 1) $0.00
Accept (Alternative 2) $1.12
Differentials Effect on income (Alternative 2) $1.12
B. Accepted (Alternative 2)
Explanation:
a. Preparation of a differential analysis dated March 16 on whether to reject (Alternative 1) or accept (Alternative 2) the special order.
DIFFERENTIAL ANALYSIS
Reject (Alternative 1) or Accept (Alternative 2)
March 16
Reject Accept Differentials Effect on income
(Alternative 1) (Alternative 2) (Alternative 2)
Revenue per unit $0.00 $7.20 $7.20
Costs:
Variable manufacturing costs per unit
$0.00 -$5.00 -$5.00
Export tariff per unit
$0.00 -$1.08 -$1.08
($7.20*15%=$1.08)
Income (Loss) per unit $0.00 $1.12 $1.12
b. Based on the above differential analysis
the special order should be ACCEPTED (Alternative 2).
Answer:
$5,580 and $3,588
Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
Total Carrying costs is
= Average inventory × the carrying cost per phaser
= (360 phasers ÷ 2) × 31
= $5,580
And,
The Restocking cost is
= Number of orders × the fixed order cost
= 52 × 69
= $3,588
The 52 is the total weeks in a year
We simply applied the above formula
<span>If a firm is selling a search good, you will no doubt find them using informational advertising to promote their product because it has proven to be the most effective for this type of good. On the other hand, if they are selling an experience good, the advertising they will probably employ is persuasive advertising. Many companies have spent millions of dollars researching the best form of advertising for each product they offer for sale.</span>
Answer:
Select the answer that best describes the strategies in this game.
- Both companies dominant strategy is to add the train.
Does a Nash equilibrium exist in this game?
- A Nash equilibrium exists where both companies add a train. (Since I'm not sure how your matrix is set up I do not know the specific location).
Explanation:
we can prepare a matrix to determine the best strategy:
Swiss Rails
add train do not add train
$1,500 / $2,000 /
add train $4,000 $7,500
EuroRail
do not add train $4,000 / $3,000 /
$2,000 $3,000
Swiss Rails' dominant strategy is to add the train = $1,500 + $4,000 = $5,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
EuroRail's dominant strategy is to add the train = $4,000 + $7,500 = $11,500. The additional revenue generated by not adding = $5,000.
A Nash equilibrium exists because both companies' dominant strategy is to add a train.
