You decided to write a research paper on the idea that Catherine the Great of Russia was the greatest monarch that ever lived. Y
ou have sources from the Catherine the Great Historical Society, articles from the Russian newspaper and handouts from The Hermitage, the art museum that Catherine the Great created. Pitfalls in credibility?
The main problem with this research would be the fact that it might not be objective enough. The sources that you have gathered are likely to state that Catherine the Great was the greatest monarch that ever lived, because they are all linked to her in some positive way. In order for the research to be trustworthy, it would need to argue the negative side as well. Otherwise, the analysis would be too biased.
It seems to me that the research is not objective enough. The sources you used seem to give information only from the Russian side. Sources from a different point of view should be consulted; let's remember that history is written in most cases by the ones who are, or were, in charge. Maybe for Russian history Catherine the Great was really the best monarch that ever lived, but for countries that surrounded Russia she was not.
My suggestion si to determine the characteristics of a great monarch then, based on those characteristics, compare Catherine the Great with other monarchs. In that way your arguments will be solid and won't lack of credibility.
With this faith, we will be able to hew out of the mountain of despair a stone of hope. With this faith, we will be able to transform the jangling discords of Explanation:
ead the following excerpt and pay close attention to the words the author uses:
Answer: everyone has different ways of learning and a different intelligence that they use in their daily lives
Explanation: every student has certain learning styles that work better for them than others. An auditory learner, for example, may focus better while listening to an audiobook than they would while reading a book.
