<h3>C
reating a method of capital punishment that would actually deter people from committing murder.</h3>
Explanation:
Numerous studies have shown that imposing capital punishment or harsh punishments does not actually deter people from committing crimes. Studies have shown that states imposing such punishments still have high criminal rate than those states that do not.
Televising executions would only create a lobby for more controversies and futile discussions on the morality of capital punishment. Human rights activists strongly disagree of commercializing such events on grounds of human moral rights. They also believe that a state does not have the right to execute an individual.
It is believed that capital punishments are imposed very rarely and only to those individuals who have committed heinous crimes. However, if we look into past incidences, the verdict has been used unfairly and partially. The power to impose such verdict also raises the question on the sovereign authority of a state by many critics. Critics argue that states should not have to right to determine the lives of the people.
Answer:
where is the map i can't see it
Answer:
Transformational leadership
Explanation:
The concept of leadership is based on the ability to lead a group of different people toward a common goal. Transformational leadership <u>is based on a manager who encourages the high performance of his team through influence, inspiration, example, and motivation.</u> This stance allows for more humane, efficient and results-oriented management. <u><em>The transformational leader knows each member of his team, their ambitions, their personal values, their preferences and limitations. The main foundations of its management are trust, respect, collaboration and commitment.</em></u>
Answer: Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois and President Franklin Pierce.
Context/details:
The Kansas-Nebraska Act enacted by Congress in 1854. It granted popular sovereignty to the people in the Kansas and Nebraska territories, letting them decide whether they'd allow slavery. In essence, this made the Kansas-Nebraska act a repeal of the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had said there would be no slavery north of latitude 36°30´ except for Missouri.
After the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act, pro-slavery and anti-slavery settlers rushed into Kansas to try to sway the outcome of the issue, and violence between the two sides occurred. The term "bleeding Kansas" was used because of the bloodshed.
