Answer:
Behaviorsim
Explanation:
When John B. Watson developed behaviorism, he thought that any individual, no matter where he/she came from, could be trained in a specific way under the adequate conditions. Behaviorism holds that a person develops his/her behavior based on conditioning, and conditioning takes place when the individual interacts with the environment. Supporters of this theory think that we change the way we act depending on the environmental stimuli.
Answer:
A or D
Explanation:
Federalists supported the ratification of the new Constitution and believed a more robust national government with greater powers was necessary to unite the individual states and create a stronger country. Anti-Federalists opposed ratification and believed power should be concentrated with the states rather than with the federal government.
This is the kind of concept a utilitarian would agree on. If the result is positive for a large group of people, we should seriously consider doing it.
However, I would like to comment on this concept. In my opinion (and that's what you're asking for) there are situations in which the ends don't justify the means. You can e.g. think about mass-bombings to fight against terrorism. However, the possibility exists that innocent people will be hit, and will die. Therefore, the end don't always justify the means (in my opinion).
