Answer:
You should recommend the applicant, but qualify your recommendation by pointing out that you think he may have exaggerated some details on his resume
Explanation:
Engineers are ethically obligated to prevent the misrepresentation of their associate's qualifications. You must make your employer aware of the incorrect facts on the resume. On the other hand, if you really believe that the applicant would make a good employee, you should make that recommendation as well. Unless you are making the hiring decision, ethics requires only that you be truthful. If you believe the applicant has merit, you should state so. It is the company's decision to remove or not remove the applicant from consideration because of this transgression.
This example illustrates the fundamental attribution error. It is a tendency of a person that explain a certain behavior of someone based on that person's personality. This is to underestimate the effect of external factors like events that happened which lead to that person's behavior at that moment.
Producers want to charge prices that at least will return all their costs: the cost of production, compensation for the time they and their employees spend on the production, and the cost of material, but in an ideal case they want to charge more so that they can earn profits.
I believe the answer is: True
General environment include all possible settings where various tasks is about to be conducted. Managers are obligated To use the information regarding general environment as a basis for materials that they must consider in their future strategies.
Of the different categories of children found in most classrooms, researchers have come to have the best understanding of the "popular" and "rejected" child.
Popular children get numerous positive and few negative selections. They are all around preferred by others and they are agreeable, amiable, inviting, and touchy to others. Where rejected children get numerous negative and couple of positive designations. They are effectively hated. They display less positive social aptitudes and qualities than do kids in alternate gatherings, and they indicate weaker scholarly and scholarly capacities.
