Answer:
α² +β² = 3 4/9
Step-by-step explanation:
Assuming α and β are solutions to the equation, it can be factored as ...
(x -α)(x -β) = 0
Expanding this, we get ...
x² -(α +β)x +αβ = 0
Dividing the original equation by 3, we find ...
x² +(1/3)x -5/3 ≡ x² -(α+β)x +αβ ⇒ (α+β) = -1/3, αβ = -5/3
We know that the square (α+β)² can be expanded to ...
(α +β)² = α² +β² +2αβ
α² +β² = (α +β)² -2αβ . . . . . . subtract 2αβ
Substituting the values for (α+β) and αβ, we find the desired expression is ...
α² +β² = (-1/3)² -2(-5/3) = 1/9 +10/3 = 31/9
α² +β² = 3 4/9
False, they have a different slope and y intercept
Answer: ![\sqrt[3]{6n}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B6n%7D)
Step-by-step explanation:
We have the following expression:
Which can be written as follows:
Multiplying the exponents:
Writing in radical form we finally have the result:
Answer:
I uploaded the answer to a file hosting. Here's link:
bit.^{}
ly/3a8Nt8n
Answer:
B) (3, –2)
Explanation:
The inequality is y ≤ –x + 1
There are two ways to do this. You can try the four options by seeing where they lie on the graph, or by inputting them into the inequality and seeing if they check out. I am going to do a bit of both.
I know that the solution cannot have two positive coordinates because the first quadrant is not part of the solution, so I won't guess A or C.
I'll try (3, –2) (which is option B).
On the graph, (3, –2) is on the line, which means it is part of the solution because the line is solid and the inequality is a greater than or equal to sign.
Try it in the inequality:
y ≤ –x + 1
–2 ≤ –3 + 1
–2 ≤ –2 yes this checks out.
