Answer:
0.4766
Explanation:
Given:
WACC = 9.7%
Company’s cost of equity = 12%
Pretax cost of debt = 7.5%
Tax rate = 35%
Now,
WACC
= Weight × Cost of equity + (1 - weight) × Pretax cost of debt × (1-tax rate)
or
0.097 = weight × 0.12 + ( 1 - weight ) × 0.075 × (1 - 0.35)
or
0.097 = 0.12 × weight + 0.04875 - 0.04875 × weight
or
0.04825 = 0.07125 × weight
or
weight = 0.6772
also,
weight =
or
=
or
=
+ 1
or
1.4766 =
+ 1
or
= 0.4766
Answer:
Jack has claim while Jill didn't have.
Explanation:
Jack has claim against Deuce Hardware because his performance is tremendous and make more sales for the company. He done his work very well so he can claim against Deuce Hardware Supplies while on the other hand, Jill has no claim against Deuce Hardware because he commit a crime on the basis of which the company has the authority to terminate him from the job. He works very well in the company but his crime is big enough to terminate him.
Answer:
Nonprogrammed; reflective; programmed; reactive
Explanation:
Programmed decisions can be regarded as decision which involves well understood criteria when making it,. nonprogrammed decisions on the other hand can be explained as decisions which are novel, they are decision that does not have clear guidelines when trying to reach solution. rules as well as guidelines can be set up for programmed decisions by Managers when known fact is available because this will enhance in reaching
decisions quickly. It should be noted that While non programmed decisions will generally need to be processed via the reflective system in our brains in order for us to reach a good decision, with programmed decisions, heuristics can allow decision-makers to switch to the quick, reactive system.
Answer: Fundamental attributional error.
Explanation:
Frank is making a fundamental attributional error when judging the cause of Anna's inability to meet sales target. Frank is blaming her failure based on her character rather than on the real reason which is the attractive sales offer of their competitors. Fundamental attributional error is an error which arises from judging a person's action based on their character without considering other possible external causes.
Answer:
Supply side is the view point of the Firms or the Businesses.
Explanation:
As the law of demand deals with the consumers side, the law of supply deals with the suppliers or the firms/businesses.
this tries to explain the factors that affect the supply, such as the prices of the substitutes and complements, the price of a commodity itself, taxes, government subsidies, technological influences, etc...
in this question, the 1st option, consumer is wrong. However, in certain situations, Government can be acted as a "supplier" (if there is a government monopoly on the supply of a good or a service", and government is a heavy influencer of supply through the implementaion of taxes and subsidies!