1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nexus9112 [7]
3 years ago
11

Explain how the Framers of the Constitution divided American government to create a democracy. a) Describe and give examples of

the two systems in place that protect against one branch having too much power. b) Why are these systems important to American democracy?
History
2 answers:
BARSIC [14]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

a) Two historical examples of self rule and democratic rule are: the colonial assemblies that developed in the colonies, and the election of George Washington as president of the constitutional convention. The colonial assemblies represent a self-ruling government. These governments did not have limits on their power, and were able to rule however they wanted, without representation from their citizens. This showed the Framers of the constitution that a self-ruling government was not the way the United States should be; there should be limits to a government's power. The election of George Washington as president of the constitutional convention shows democratic rule. The people had a say in who was elected, and this further inspired the Framers to institute this in the Constitution.  

b) It is seen in both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution that enlightenment philosophy had some influence on them. John Locke, an enlightenment thinker, stated that “all persons are endowed with natural rights to life, liberty and property” and that “rulers who fail to protect these rights may be removed by the people, by force if necessary.” We can see that the Declaration of Independence took inspirations from these statements because in the Declaration it states “Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness,” it also emphasizes that the government cannot take natural rights, and “We the People” can over power the government and institute a new government that works better. Locke also spoke out for the rights of thought, speech, and religion. This is reflected in the U.S Constitution in the Bill of Rights under the first amendment where it says “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press…”

c) The Framers believed that the best form of government is one that provides leadership, protection, and services for its citizens. They wanted to ensure that the government did not exceed its power, and to protect their citizens rights. These purposes were developed/inspired through enlightenment philosophy. Enlightenment philosophers - like John Locke and Thomas Hobbes - believed that people form governments in order to ensure their interests, at a cost of giving up some liberty in exchange for cooperation. They also believed that people had human rights. These ideals were later instituted into papers like the Constitution and Declaration of Independence, which ensured the rights of the citizens.

Artist 52 [7]3 years ago
4 0
T<span>he Framers of the Constitution divided American government into three branches: the executive, legislative, and judicial. This created a better democracy because the power is not concentrated within one branch or in the hands of a few. 

The systems in </span><span>place that protect against one branch having too much power is called "separation of powers" and "checks and balances." This system keeps each branch from getting too powerful by limiting its powers. For example, the legislative branch can pass a law but the president veto it. That's a way the executive branch checks the legislative. And let's say the legislature really wants to pass that law, so they vote on it. With 2/3 majority of votes for the law, Congress can override the president's veto. That's a way the legislative branch checks on the executive. And let's say that although that law was passed by the legislature, some say that it's unconstitutional. If that happens, then the judicial branch checks out the law and can declare it unconstitutional. If it's declared unconstitutional, then the law will be no longer enforced or valid. That's a way the judicial branch checks the other branches. 

Other examples of "checks and balances" is how the president is in charge of the armed forces, but only Congress can declare war. The judicial branch interprets laws and their constitutionality, but the president appoint the federal judges. The president appoints the federal judges, but the legislative branch has to approve those officials. The legislative branch also decides how many judges would be in the Supreme Court. The president can veto and the judicial can repeal laws, but the legislature can impeach the president and federal judges/officials. 

These systems are important to American democracy because they keep the government from getting too powerful and oppressing the people. </span>
You might be interested in
If folded land can't bend anymore, it cracks and breaks into big blocks that move along faults in different directions, grinding
LUCKY_DIMON [66]
Earthquakes and tremors
7 0
3 years ago
I’ll give brainlist to whoever gets it correct
Dovator [93]

Answer:

Economically, the population decrease brought by the Columbian Exchange indirectly caused a drastic labor shortage throughout the Americas, which eventually contributed to the establishment of African slavery on a vast scale in the Americas.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Was President Franklin Roosevelt right to use the new deal programs to help recover the American economy
Lostsunrise [7]

Answer:

yes he was

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Hercules was able to catch the giant boar by?
Maru [420]

Answer:

Pholus

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the argument presented for advocates of bottle-feeding?
aleksley [76]
<span>The main argument presented was that parents were able to monitor and keep track of the milk being consumed by their baby. When a child is breast-feeding it is not as simple to measure the amount that your child is consuming, and thus, proponents of the bottle argued for the bottle in that regard.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Britain and France signed an entente and became the a. Central Forces. c. Central Powers. b. Allied Forces. d. Axis Powers.
    15·1 answer
  • How did the ideas of thomas malthus influence darwins thinking about evolution?
    8·1 answer
  • Which invention by eli whitney increased interest in slavery? r?
    15·1 answer
  • What specifically was Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. speaking out against when he made this statement in 1958? “I could never adjust
    10·2 answers
  • PLEASE HURYYY how does the hot and humid climate help preserve human remains?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is true about emergency powers ?
    10·1 answer
  • A communication medium that brought the colonies closer together as it evolved was
    10·1 answer
  • Why do Indians kill animals
    7·2 answers
  • Ways that Hitler gained the support of the police.
    7·1 answer
  • What is "Evidence Beyond the Documents"?<br> (AP world history)
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!