1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nexus9112 [7]
3 years ago
11

Explain how the Framers of the Constitution divided American government to create a democracy. a) Describe and give examples of

the two systems in place that protect against one branch having too much power. b) Why are these systems important to American democracy?
History
2 answers:
BARSIC [14]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

a) Two historical examples of self rule and democratic rule are: the colonial assemblies that developed in the colonies, and the election of George Washington as president of the constitutional convention. The colonial assemblies represent a self-ruling government. These governments did not have limits on their power, and were able to rule however they wanted, without representation from their citizens. This showed the Framers of the constitution that a self-ruling government was not the way the United States should be; there should be limits to a government's power. The election of George Washington as president of the constitutional convention shows democratic rule. The people had a say in who was elected, and this further inspired the Framers to institute this in the Constitution.  

b) It is seen in both the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution that enlightenment philosophy had some influence on them. John Locke, an enlightenment thinker, stated that “all persons are endowed with natural rights to life, liberty and property” and that “rulers who fail to protect these rights may be removed by the people, by force if necessary.” We can see that the Declaration of Independence took inspirations from these statements because in the Declaration it states “Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness,” it also emphasizes that the government cannot take natural rights, and “We the People” can over power the government and institute a new government that works better. Locke also spoke out for the rights of thought, speech, and religion. This is reflected in the U.S Constitution in the Bill of Rights under the first amendment where it says “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press…”

c) The Framers believed that the best form of government is one that provides leadership, protection, and services for its citizens. They wanted to ensure that the government did not exceed its power, and to protect their citizens rights. These purposes were developed/inspired through enlightenment philosophy. Enlightenment philosophers - like John Locke and Thomas Hobbes - believed that people form governments in order to ensure their interests, at a cost of giving up some liberty in exchange for cooperation. They also believed that people had human rights. These ideals were later instituted into papers like the Constitution and Declaration of Independence, which ensured the rights of the citizens.

Artist 52 [7]3 years ago
4 0
T<span>he Framers of the Constitution divided American government into three branches: the executive, legislative, and judicial. This created a better democracy because the power is not concentrated within one branch or in the hands of a few. 

The systems in </span><span>place that protect against one branch having too much power is called "separation of powers" and "checks and balances." This system keeps each branch from getting too powerful by limiting its powers. For example, the legislative branch can pass a law but the president veto it. That's a way the executive branch checks the legislative. And let's say the legislature really wants to pass that law, so they vote on it. With 2/3 majority of votes for the law, Congress can override the president's veto. That's a way the legislative branch checks on the executive. And let's say that although that law was passed by the legislature, some say that it's unconstitutional. If that happens, then the judicial branch checks out the law and can declare it unconstitutional. If it's declared unconstitutional, then the law will be no longer enforced or valid. That's a way the judicial branch checks the other branches. 

Other examples of "checks and balances" is how the president is in charge of the armed forces, but only Congress can declare war. The judicial branch interprets laws and their constitutionality, but the president appoint the federal judges. The president appoints the federal judges, but the legislative branch has to approve those officials. The legislative branch also decides how many judges would be in the Supreme Court. The president can veto and the judicial can repeal laws, but the legislature can impeach the president and federal judges/officials. 

These systems are important to American democracy because they keep the government from getting too powerful and oppressing the people. </span>
You might be interested in
The Korean war was relatively short but exceptionally bloody. Nearly ___ million people died. More than half of these about 10 p
hoa [83]

Answer: The Korean war was relatively short but exceptionally bloody. Nearly _5__ million people died. More than half of these about 10 percent of Korea's prewar population-were _civilians__. (this rate of civilian casualties was higher than world war 2's and vietnam's.) Almost _40,000__ Americans died in action in korea, and more than __100,000__ were Wounded.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Will give brainly!
Usimov [2.4K]

Answer:

In 1859, a man in Solferino, Italy, watched as 40,000 people died due to a war. His name was John Henry Dunant. Dunant led a group of volunteers to help those wounded people, as hospitals were overflowing. Dunant made a pamphlet in 1862 called "a Memory of Solferino" which he told everyone about what had happened. The pamphlet ended with the plea, "Would it not be possible to found and organize in all civilized countries permanent societies of volunteers who in time of war would give help to the wounded without regard for their nationality?" His idea became well known, and a meeting was held in Geneva, Switzerland, Dunant's very own country. They discussed the formation of those societies. It was attended by people from 16 countries and many charitable organizations. They formed the idea for the soon to be Red Cross.

They persuaded their own individual governments to ratify what is now known as the first Geneva Convention. By 1869, many red cross societies were formed, and 22 countries signed the Geneva Convention. There were four Geneva Conventions all together. The first one protects victims of land battles, the second protects victims of sea battles, the third Convention protects prisoners of war, and the fourth and final convention protects enemy aliens. These principles make up over half of the international welfare laws. Their seven main principles are, Humanity, Impartiality, Neutrality, Independence, Voluntary service, and Unity.

The modern red cross has over 200,000,000 volunteers from 135 countries. All across the world these people are working to achieve the same goal.

8 0
3 years ago
NSC-68 led to a rapid build-up of defense resources in the U.S. The goal was to prevent war with the Soviet Union by building up
Paha777 [63]

Answer:

(This is an opinionated question so there actually is no right or wrong answer. I will put what <em>I </em>would have answered, and you can change it up it's not what you would put :] )

Explanation:

I would have chosen more peaceful tactics. Though it's true that the Soviet Union may have went against any peace treaties as they have plenty of times, it's ultimately a better option than spending all our time and money, that could be better spent on other things within our country, on stockpiling weapons. It has been useful in being a reminder to other countries not to test the U.S., but it's also cost a lot of money that could be put towards better causes.

I hope this helped :)

3 0
3 years ago
The Battle of New Orleans during the War of 1812: had no effect on the war was the final, decisive battle was a significant batt
Rina8888 [55]
Had no effect on the war I think because it was fought after the treaty was already signed. 
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the most likely reason the author ends the article with the quote from Michael Berenbaum?
Aneli [31]
Can you please put a picture with the artical
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which headline provides the best example of a first amendment guarantee in action
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following was a characteristic of the Scientific Revolution?
    15·1 answer
  • Which colony did the first mass influx of slaves populate?
    10·2 answers
  • How did the political ideas of the enlightenment represent a break with the ideas of Europe's past?
    7·1 answer
  • HEELEPPPP PLEASEEE ASAPPP!!!!
    10·1 answer
  • What was the main effect of the improvements in military technology during World War I?
    14·2 answers
  • Based on the images, which statement is true about the three organisms?
    11·2 answers
  • Based on this information can conclude that:
    9·1 answer
  • Why do countries join together in trade blocs?
    10·2 answers
  • 12
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!