Answer:
B) Discrimination can be subtle and indirect.
Explanation:
My idea on cancel culture is that it can get extreme and unproductive when it gets toxic.
<h3>Cancel culture</h3>
Cancel culture is a way that people use to express their displeasure and anger over issues that they find dissatisfying.
It leads to ostracizing people or organizations due to their acts, behaviors or opinions.
Even though it can deter people and even organizations from posting offensive views, it could be negative most times.
- Cancel culture can get too far when the people are against anyone who has a different opinion from them.
- It could be regarded as toxic if it drives the other party to want to harm themselves
- If it involves invasion of privacy and threat.
It is not the best response for wrongdoing because there are other ways of tackling issues and disagreements without ostracizing the other person.
Read more on cancel culture on:
brainly.com/question/21840416?referrer=searchResults
Explanation:
Interesting in<em> “Speech to the Second Virginia Convention”</em> by Patrick Henry we note his use of figurative language to buttress his point and to compel his listening audience. He said emphatically, <em>"We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth, and listen to the song of that siren till she transforms us into beasts." </em>
Meanwhile, Ellen Sirleaf Johnson uses similar figurative language used by Henry, depicting the inaction of the world's government as a form of keep silent. She said,
<em>"the call for the reform of the United Nations...rings louder in its definite silence.. we urge the nations of the world...to bring this long silence to an end."</em>
