Latin America, like much of the developing world, will have to face serious challenges in the current century. Environmental changes, persistent inequality, and increasing violence force millions of people throughout the region to live in a constant state of uncertainty. Hispanics are split on whether they think of themselves as a “typical American” or “very different from a typical American.” According to the survey, 49% of Hispanics say the former, while 44% say the latter. Latinos in the U.S. describe their identity in many ways, reflecting the diversity of origins in the Latino community, the immigrant experience and geography. Broadly, some Latinos use pan-ethnic terms such as “Hispanic” or “Latino” to describe their identity; some prefer their family’s Hispanic origin group; others use “American”. For Puerto Ricans, among those born on the island (or in another country outside the U.S.), 74% most often use the term “Puerto Rican” to describe themselves. Among Puerto Ricans born in the 50 states or D.C., just 42% do the same. Half (48%) of second-generation Hispanics most often describe themselves by their family’s Hispanic origin name. We can divide the environmental challenges into those that are already apparent and those that will become more so through the 21st C. (World Bank, 2016) Among the former, the most obvious one is the pollution that mars many cities in Latin America. In many cases, this results not so much from industry as from the massive concentration in 1-2 urban areas in each country. This pollution can be both airborne, and arguably more important, also originates in the underdevelopment of sanitation infrastructure. Half (48%) of Mexicans say they think of themselves as a typical American, while 46% say they think of themselves as very different from a typical American. Among South Americans in the U.S., those shares are 46% and 48%, respectively.
Answer:
C) Is not engaging or imaginative
Explanation:
I'm like 93% sure this is the correct answer
I hope that this helps :)
Have a nice day!
1. To persist in anything undertaken
2. Maintain a purpose in spite of difficulty
The above question wants to assess your ability to read, interpret and write. For that reason, it's not right for me to write down the logical analysis you need, but I'll show you how to write one.
First, you need to know that the letter Benjamin Banneker wrote to Thomas Jefferson was intended to convince him to fight for abolitionism.
That's because Benjamin Banneker had joined a group of men who were in favor of ending slavery, but he knew politically relevant men needed to join that group and support abolitionism and so he wrote the letter to Jefferson.
In this case, the entire letter shows that objective, presenting Jefferson the reasons that make abolitionism a good policy for America and the reasons that make slavery bad.
Based on this, to write your logic analysis you should:
- Read the entire text and reread if necessary.
- Start your analysis by showing what the letter is and what its main purpose is.
- Show how the author develops this goal.
- Show how the sentences the author uses to defend his position on the subject of the letter.
- Assess whether the type of language the author presented is appropriate.
- Show how the author presents slavery and ways to combat it.
- Show your opinion of the letter and the way its author approaches the subject presented.
More information:
brainly.com/question/24751035?referrer=searchResults
An independent clause is a clause that can stand alone in a sentence. (it expresses a complete thought.
a dependent clause is a clause with a subject and a verb, but it does not express a complete thought, therefore it can not serve as a sentence alone.
