Answer:
Depending on who you would choose, the answer is:
Louis Napoleon<u><em> just stuck with his writing and abandoned the people by just giving himself all the power in the new government and removing the existing parliamentary assembly. </em></u>And Otto Von Bismarck's Realpolitik result <em><u>was the Kulturkampf. </u></em>
Explanation:
It's clear that both politicians appeal to the people to achieve their goals, but Louis Napoleon and Otto Von Bismarck acted differently. <u><em>The French politician only proposed the reformation but never put in action (it was something that was only on the paper). In the end, Louis Napoleon decided to renew the Assembly. He opted for the easiest way. </em></u>On the other hand, <u><em>Bismarck was greed and violent when it comes to politics. His Realpolitik resulted in an internal war between the government and the Catholic Church, which became known as the Kulturkampf.</em></u>
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Causation, as opposed to correlation, is a relationship between two events in which one event directly caused the other.
Solution :
French Revolution is the major social upheaval or social protest which occurred in France. The major upheaval occurred with the widespread dissatisfaction with the French monarchy and also for the poor economic policies of King Louis XVI.
The French Revolution began in 1789 and lasted for 10 years.
The following are the causes and the developments of the French revolution :
1. Poor harvests ---- Cause
2. Arming of the citizens of Paris ---- Development
3. High taxes on Third Estate ----- Cause
4. Ineffective leadership by king Louis XVI ---- Cause
5. Debts from the French support of the American Revolution ---- Cause
6. Formation of the National Assembly ----- Development
7. Destruction of Nobles' property ----- Development
