1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mice21 [21]
3 years ago
14

The impact of Jackson’s Indian policies on the Native American population.

History
1 answer:
larisa86 [58]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Explanation:

The Indian Removal Act was signed into law on May 28, 1830, by United States President Andrew Jackson. The law authorized the president to negotiate with southern Native American tribes for their removal to federal territory west of the Mississippi River in exchange for white settlement of their ancestral lands.

plz mark as brainliest

You might be interested in
Whose actions sparked the Montgomery bus boycott?
Anika [276]
A) Rosa Parks actions sparked the Montgomery bus boycott. She was forced to move to the back of the bus to give her seat up for a white woman, but refused to. During this time period in the South, African Americans were supposed to sit in the back of the bus, and could only sit in the front of the bus if no Whites were on the bus at the same time.
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the result of the margin calls from brokers on October 21, 1929?
Fed [463]

Answer:

The right answer is "A panic ensued and people began to sell their stocks, causing prices to dive."

Explanation:

The margin calls made by brokers cause a mini-crash of the market on March 25, 1929. Prices plummeted. There was a temporary solution when some prominent bankers promised they would continue to lend, assuaging investors´concerns.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was the victory of the ‘Bonhomme Richard so important?
stira [4]

Answer:

he convinced the French crown to back the colonies in their fight to become independent of British authority.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
HELP PLS<br> Why is there only two senators in each state?
andreev551 [17]
If the system were being designed today, such a design probably would be rejected as unfair. Part of the problem is that the Framers were dealing with a less lopsided distribution. The ratio between most populous state and least populous stat in 1789 was about 7 to 1. Today, the ratio between California and Wyoming population is 50 to 1.

But the Senate made sense to the Framers in 1787 for a particular reason. At that time, all 13 former colonies were like independent nations or independent countries. They could mint their own coins, print their own money, and conduct international diplomacy directly with other nations. There are lots of reasons this was unsatisfactory. It produced economic chaos and a poor prospect of winning future wars, but it did give each state the status of a country.

Now, imagine you’re a small state like New Hampshire. Right now, you completely control your own destiny. Why do you want to join a Union unless you’re guaranteed a strong voice in that Union? Now, all the arguments that people still have about the Electoral College (“The big states would push all the little states around!”) actually do apply.

It is the Senate that does a superb job… if anything TOO good a job… of protecting “small states rights.” You can argue that it is an unfair system, and it probably is… but the point is this: In 1787, the question of how to get small states like New Hampshire to join this new Union, which was after all seemed like a risky experiment, was a big problem.

It’s really for political reasons, not absolute fairness, that the Senate was created in such a way as to give equal representation to each state. It seemed necessary in 1787. But there were lots of things that could not be foreseen, such as the rise of a strong national culture and the eventually lopsided ratios between the most populous and least populous states.

Now, let me address the “House of Representatives” question. How can the Senate be based on 2-senators-per-state while the House is based on population?
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help me please squad fam ;)
mamaluj [8]

These laws included new powers to deport foreigners as well as making it harder for new immigrants to vote.

The Federalists believed that Democratic-Republican criticism of Federalist policies was disloyal and feared that aliens living in the United States would sympathize with the French during a war.

So, I would say B and E

Hope this helps!! If it doesn't tell me what was wrong. :)

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Georgia general assembly is comprised of the
    6·2 answers
  • How effectively do you think president kennedy handled the cuban missile crisis?
    6·1 answer
  • When do the Spaniards win their first battle in the war of the reconquest?
    15·2 answers
  • Why do you think dromedaries do not bother to seek shade
    7·1 answer
  • ¿Para Platón, el problema del mal en el mundo cual es ?
    7·1 answer
  • Which outcome could be considered a cost of voting?
    13·2 answers
  • PLEASE please read the statement and answer the question below
    8·1 answer
  • 99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
    14·1 answer
  • Which is an example of collective bargaining?
    7·1 answer
  • 5. INFORMATIVE WRITING Identify three examples of political,
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!