1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
DanielleElmas [232]
4 years ago
15

Why did Totalitarian states rise after WW1 and what did they do?

History
1 answer:
masya89 [10]4 years ago
4 0
Because after the world war 1 , The world was in a very bad shape and depression happened in many countries
That's why many leaders saw this as an opportunities to create a new movement and regain power

hope this helps
You might be interested in
How does the development of an alphabet directly impact the Phoenicians maritime trade
CaHeK987 [17]
Search it up
It would be better
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How would the computer improve business productivity?
11Alexandr11 [23.1K]

Answer:

software programs could be used to increase efficiency

Explanation:

Today, information technology has tightly entered into all areas of our lives. Software and information technology have become part of a large number of products and services. Information technologies are widely used in business, changing the process of production, promotion, and sale of various tangible and intangible goods. There are many software products for optimizing business processes, increasing control over document flows, and for maintaining internal documentation processing. Thanks to information technology, it has become possible to exchange information over long distances and do business in different countries. Information technology enables unlimited expansion of the business, as well as automate the management process as a whole. Information technology significantly reduces the time spent on transactions, the collection and processing of information, and the introduction of IT in the business allows the most efficient use of production resources.

5 0
4 years ago
1. A republic is a form of government without
Art [367]

1. B. a monarch

A republic is a form of government that doesn't have monarch as its head. In the republics, the supreme power lies within the people. The people are the ones that have the power to vote and choose who to represent them, thus who to be in charge of the country for a particular time. If the people are satisfied with the politicians they have elected, they will elect them again, if they are not happy with them, they will elect other politicians to replace them, thus punishing them for their bad ruling.

2. B. They passed laws and decides on tax rates

The consuls in the Roman Republic had a very important role in the Roman politics. They were the ones that were in charge of the senate, thus they were the ones that were making the decisions in Rome. It is easy to see how big of a rile they in the fact that they were the ones that were passing the laws, as well as determining the taxation. Even the military was under their control, so the actions of the military were their responsibility, and if they needed it, they had it at disposal at any time.

3. B. Separate branches of government make, enforce, and interpret laws

The United States government has lot of similarities with the manner in which ancient Rome was functioning. It can even be said that the government of the United States is just a modernized version of the Roman one. This can be seen in the manner in which the making, enforcing, and interpretation of laws is performed. It is not single body of the government that does this, but instead there's several that are included in the process, all with their own specific task, and with the purpose being to not permit a single body to have absolute power, thus protecting the interest of the the people.

4. 1. In both, the United States and ancient Rome, lot of people were stripped of the right to vote. This can be put to a common reason for both, as the people that were stripped of voting were the slaves. The United States needed lot of slaves as work force, and in its interest at that time was that they keep the slaves in the dark. They didn't needed a population that was going to be educated and in touch with all the things, as that ind of population was not going to do the work of the field, thus they were not given basic rights. The Romans were well aware of how much the slaves hated them, and even if given the rights they deserved, they were going to turn against them eventually, so they were trying to keep them as tight as possible.

  2. These rules started to change over time though, as the slaves were becoming more and more integral part of the societies, and also they started to ask for their rights, which led to gradual improvement in their rights, including the voting ones. The slaves saw that the societies are heavily dependent on them economically, so once they saw an opportunity when the economy was not in great shape, they started to revolt and ask for their rights, thus playing well tactically at the right time, and eventually wining the status of equal citizens as everyone else.

  3. If this hadn't happened though, the United States nowadays would have been a much different place fro living. The white population would have been in charge of everything. The migration would have been regulated in a manner in which only people from certain race or ethnicity can come in. Millions of people would have had no basic human rights and would have been treated like animals, working for the white population to accumulate wealth. There would have been no mixing of cultures, yet alone of genes.

3 0
4 years ago
U.S. relations with China question
Ilya [14]
Because China started the world wide sickness
4 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP!!! How did the Ancient Chinese dynasty and Mesopotamian kings treat their people differently
Alona [7]

Answer:

https://oi.uchicago.edu/research/symposia/religion-and-power-divine-kingship-ancient-world-and-beyond-0

Explanation:

The application of Frazer’s study to the civilizations of the ancient Near East is, however, problematical. His interpretation of sacred kingship was strongly influenced by Christian imagery (Feeley-Harnick 1985). Frazer made a certain form of regicide in which the divine king is sacrificed to ensure continued fertility and prosperity for the community a central element of divine kingship. This form of regicide, however, does not seem to play an important role in all of the societies that exhibit the phenomenon of divinization of the king.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Our national anthem was written in what US city ?
    10·1 answer
  • What were the effects of world war one and world war two on social and cultural life in Nevada.
    9·2 answers
  • Which of the following fears did some Americans have about acquiring new territory in the Mexican Cession? New slave states woul
    7·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP ME!!!!!!!!!!
    6·2 answers
  • Who decides the times place and manner for holding elections for congress?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of these BEST describes the concept of “strict construction
    10·1 answer
  • 5 causas de la segunda guerra mundial, por favor...
    12·1 answer
  • How did the Internet and cable television affect Americans?
    7·2 answers
  • Read these passages from the Article. Which one shows that olive trees are very strong?
    14·1 answer
  • What are the three most significant sources of pollution to the chang jiang in china?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!